Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33855093›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Standard MRI May Not Predict Specific Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Characteristics.

Roy A G Hoogeslag, Margje B Buitenhuis, Reinoud W Brouwer, Rosalie P H Derks, Sjoerd M van Raak, Rianne Huis In 't Veld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears, while type I ACL tears only account for 8% of all ACL tears.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roy A G HoogeslagCentre for Orthopaedic Surgery OCON, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Margje B BuitenhuisCentre for Orthopaedic Surgery OCON, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Reinoud W BrouwerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rosalie P H DerksDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology ZGT, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd M van RaakDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology ZGT, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Rianne Huis In 't VeldCentre for Orthopaedic Surgery OCON, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
OCON Orthopedische kliniek · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been renewed interest in the concept of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair (ACLSR). Morphologic characteristics of the ruptured ACL remnant play a role in deciding whether a patient is eligible for ACLSR. However, no classification of these characteristics of ACL rupture on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans has yet been compared with intraoperative findings in the context of ACLSR. PURPOSE: To investigate the value of using preoperative MRI to predict specific characteristics of acute complete ACL rupture. STUDY

designCohort study (diagnostic); Level of evidence, 2.

methodsA total of 25 patients were included. Two radiologists classified ACL rupture location and pattern on preoperative 1.5-T MRI scans with a standard sequence; the results were compared with the corresponding findings at arthroscopy conducted by a single surgeon. The agreement between the MRI and surgical findings was calculated using Cohen κ values. Furthermore, the reliability coefficients of the MRI classifications within and between radiologists were calculated.

resultsThe agreement between MRI classification and arthroscopic findings for ACL rupture location was slight (Cohen κ, 0.016 [radiologist 1] and 0.087 [radiologist 2]), and for ACL rupture pattern, this was poor to slight (Cohen κ, <0 and 0.074). The intraobserver reliability of MRI classification for ACL rupture location was moderate for radiologist 1 and slight for radiologist 2 (Cohen κ, 0.526 and 0.061, respectively), and for ACL rupture pattern, this was slight for radiologist 1 and 2 (Cohen κ, 0.051 and 0.093, respectively). The interobserver reliability of MRI classification for ACL rupture location and pattern was slight between radiologists (Cohen κ, 0.172 and 0.040, respectively).

conclusionIn the current study, we found poor to slight agreement between MRI classification and arthroscopic findings of specific ACL rupture characteristics. In addition, the intra- and interobserver reliability for MRI classification of the ACL rupture characteristics was slight to moderate.

Indexed as

ACLACL reconstructionACL suture repairbiologic healing enhancementbiology of ligamentdynamic intraligamentary stabilizationMRI

Identifiers

PMID33855093
PMCPMC8010830
OpenAlexW3145214894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.