Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854977›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor in Low Grade Prostate Cancer: Can It Be a Better Predictor Than Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen?

Pinuccia Faviana, Laura Boldrini, Paola Anna Erba, Iosè Di Stefano, Francesca Manassero, Riccardo Bartoletti, Luca Galli, Carlo Gentile, Massimo Bardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  2. Prospective head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor: a promising new biomarker to identify cervical precursor lesions and cancer.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Update on PSMA-based Prostate Cancer Imaging.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Two Novel [ACS omega · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrating Theranostics Into Patient Care Pathways:AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pinuccia FavianaDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Laura BoldriniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Paola Anna ErbaDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Iosè Di StefanoDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca ManasseroDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Riccardo BartolettiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Luca GalliDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Carlo GentileDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Massimo BardiDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA, United States.
University of Pisa · ITRandolph–Macon College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether prostate cancer (PC) patients can be accurately classified on the bases of tissue expression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). This retrospective study included 28 patients with PC. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were used for diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry staining techniques were used to evaluate PSMA and GRPR expression (both number of cells expressed and % of area stained). To assess the independent associations among selected variables, a multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis was used. It was found that the PSMA expression was inversely correlated with GRPR expression. Only the number of cells expressing GRPR was significantly related to the Gleason score. Both the percentage of area expressing GRPR and the number of cells expressing PSMA were close to reaching significance at the 0.05 level. MDS provided a map of the overall, independent association confirming that GRPR and PSMA represent inversely correlated measures of the same dimension. In conclusion, our data showed that GRPR expression should be evaluated in prostate biopsy specimens to improve our ability to detect PC with low grades at the earliest phases of development. Considering that GRPRs appear to be directly involved in the mechanisms of tumor proliferation, advancements in nuclear medicine radiotherapy can focus on this receptor to improve the therapeutic approach to PC. Further studies in our laboratory will investigate the molecular mechanisms of activation based on GRPR.

Indexed as

gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)Gleason scoremulti-dimensional scaling (MDS)prostate cancerprostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)

Identifiers

PMID33854977
PMCPMC8039448
OpenAlexW3148523464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.