Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854843›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Differences in the endophytic fungal community and effective ingredients in root of three

Hanli Dang, Tao Zhang, Zhongke Wang, Guifang Li, Wenqin Zhao, Xinhua Lv, Li Zhuang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A NovelThe world journal of men's health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofPlant direct · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Dendrobine biosynthesis inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanli DangCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Tao ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Zhongke WangCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Guifang LiCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Wenqin ZhaoCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Xinhua LvCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Li ZhuangCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Shihezi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndophytic fungi influence the quality and quantity of the medicinal plant's bioactive compounds through specific fungus-host interactions. Nevertheless, due to the paucity of information, the composition of endophytic fungal communities and the mechanism by which effective ingredients regulate endophytic fungal communities in roots remains unclear.

methodsIn this study, we collected root and soil samples (depth range: 0-20, 20-40, and 40-60 cm) of three

resultsWe observed that the liquiritin content was not affected by the root depth (0-20 cm, 20-40 cm, and 40-60 cm). Still, it was significantly affected by the

Indexed as

Effective ingredientsEndophytic fungal communityGlycyrrhizaRoot depthSoil physicochemical

Identifiers

PMID33854843
PMCPMC7953873
OpenAlexW3135839881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.