Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854807›Full record

ArticleScientifica2021

Prevalence and Determinants of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice among Mothers of Children Aged 6-24 Months in Hail, Saudi Arabia.

Mashail Basheir Alshammari, Hassan Kasim Haridi

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mashail Basheir AlshammariFamily & Community Medicine Joint Program, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan Kasim HaridiThe Designated Institutional Official (DIO) for Academic Affairs & Postgraduate Studies, Health Affairs, Najran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-0204
University of Ha'il · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO recommends that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development, and health. Nonadherence to exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) depends largely on the individual, sociocultural context, and institutional factors. The aim of this study is to estimate coverage and factors associated with adherence to EBF among mothers in the urban Hail region, Saudi Arabia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out during February-June 2019 among 450 mothers of children aged 6-24 months attending immunization and well-baby clinics in 6 primary healthcare centers in Hail city. A pretested structured questionnaire was used to interview the consented participants.

resultsThe majority of mothers (72.9%) were aware of EBF; 24% reported initiation of breastfeeding within one hour after delivery; however, 71.1% did during the first 24 hours. The majority (76.8%) fed colostrum to their newborn; nevertheless, 50.1% had given a prelacteal feeding. Mothers who reported EBF practice were 50.7% (CI 45.9-55.4). The adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that mother's awareness about EBF (aOR 3.03; 95% CI 1.78-5.18), antenatal care received at the governmental facility (aOR 2.63; 95% CI 1.28-5.41), breastfeeding a previous child (aOR 2.42; 95% CI 1.46-4.03), counseling received after delivery (aOR 2.47; 95% CI 1.34-4.53), and colostrum feeding given (aOR 4.24; 95% CI 2.31-7.77) were positively associated with EBF practice. On the other hand, mother's education (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.15-0.99), higher family income (aOR 0.04; 95% CI 0.00-0.31), and practice prelacteal feeding (aOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-0.97) were negatively associated with EBF practice.

conclusionEBF rate in urban Hail is still far below WHO recommendations. Efforts to strengthen mothers' counseling/support during antenatal care and immediately after delivery are needed to promote EBF practice, especially in the private sector.

Identifiers

PMID33854807
PMCPMC8019643
OpenAlexW3147878957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.