Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854772›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

Efficacy and safety of vancomycin loading doses in critically ill patients with methicillin-resistant

Alexander H Flannery, Katie L Wallace, Christian N Rhudy, Allison S Olmsted, Rachel C Minrath, Stuart M Pope, Aaron M Cook, David S Burgess, Peter E Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander H FlanneryDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone Street, TODD 251, Lexington, KY 40536, USA Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-1594
Katie L WallaceDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Christian N RhudyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Allison S OlmstedDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Rachel C MinrathDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Stuart M PopeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Aaron M CookDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
David S BurgessDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Peter E MorrisDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile vancomycin loading doses may facilitate earlier pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment, the impact of loading doses on clinical outcomes remains understudied. Critically ill patients are at highest risk of morbidity and mortality from methicillin resistant

methodsFour hundred and forty-nine critically ill patients with MRSA cultures isolated from blood or respiratory specimens were eligible for the study. Cohorts were established by receipt of a loading dose (⩾20 mg/kg actual body weight) or not. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite outcome of death within 30 days of first MRSA culture, blood cultures positive ⩾7 days, white blood cell count up to 5 days from vancomycin initiation, temperature up to 5 days from vancomycin initiation, or substitution (or addition) of another MRSA agent.

resultsThere was no difference in the percentage of patients experiencing clinical failure between the loading dose and no loading dose groups (74.8%

conclusionUse of vancomycin loading doses was not associated with improved clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with MRSA infection.

Indexed as

critical careinfectionloading dosemethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)vancomycin

Identifiers

PMID33854772
PMCPMC8013631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.