Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854607›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2021

Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice and human cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.

Yuting Li, Lilianagzi Guo, Kaiyin He, Changbing Huang, Shaohui Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuting LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lilianagzi GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kaiyin HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Changbing HuangDepartment of Information, Affiliated Hospital (Clinical College) of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Shaohui TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cancermeta-analysismortalityrisksugary beverages

Identifiers

PMID33854607
PMCPMC8040874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.