Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854255›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2021

Measuring the elastic modulus of soft culture surfaces and three-dimensional hydrogels using atomic force microscopy.

Michael D A Norman, Silvia A Ferreira, Geraldine M Jowett, Laurent Bozec, Eileen Gentleman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microengineered Gradient Hydrogels for Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Mechanotyping of Organoids for Assessing Drug-Induced Injuries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Targeting Fibrotic Scarring by Mechanoregulation of Il11ra1Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Elastic modulus of hyaluronic acid hydrogels by compression testing.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael D A Norman *Centre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, UK.
Silvia A Ferreira *Centre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, UK.
Geraldine M JowettCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8436-6637
Laurent BozecFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. l.bozec@utoronto.ca.
Eileen GentlemanCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, UK. eileen.gentleman@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-5137
King's College London · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 203757Wellcome Trust 203757/Z/16/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing interest in exploring mechanically mediated biological phenomena has resulted in cell culture substrates and 3D matrices with variable stiffnesses becoming standard tools in biology labs. However, correlating stiffness with biological outcomes and comparing results between research groups is hampered by variability in the methods used to determine Young's (elastic) modulus, E, and by the inaccessibility of relevant mechanical engineering protocols to most biology labs. Here, we describe a protocol for measuring E of soft 2D surfaces and 3D hydrogels using atomic force microscopy (AFM) force spectroscopy. We provide instructions for preparing hydrogels with and without encapsulated live cells, and provide a method for mounting samples within the AFM. We also provide details on how to calibrate the instrument, and give step-by-step instructions for collecting force-displacement curves in both manual and automatic modes (stiffness mapping). We then provide details on how to apply either the Hertz or the Oliver-Pharr model to calculate E, and give additional instructions to aid the user in plotting data distributions and carrying out statistical analyses. We also provide instructions for inferring differential matrix remodeling activity in hydrogels containing encapsulated single cells or organoids. Our protocol is suitable for probing a range of synthetic and naturally derived polymeric hydrogels such as polyethylene glycol, polyacrylamide, hyaluronic acid, collagen, or Matrigel. Although sample preparation timings will vary, a user with introductory training to AFM will be able to use this protocol to characterize the mechanical properties of two to six soft surfaces or 3D hydrogels in a single day.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesElastic ModulusMicroscopy, Atomic ForceCell LineHydrogelsSurface PropertiesHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID33854255
PMCPMC7615740
OpenAlexW3155613736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.