Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854254›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2021

Human fetal whole-body postmortem microfocus computed tomographic imaging.

Ian C Simcock, Susan C Shelmerdine, J Ciaran Hutchinson, Neil J Sebire, Owen J Arthurs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian C SimcockDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-0785
Susan C ShelmerdineDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
J Ciaran HutchinsonUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Neil J SebireUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK. Owen.Arthurs@gosh.nhs.uk.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health ICA-CDRF-2017-03-53Department of Health NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037Medical Research Council MR/R002118/1Medical Research Council MR/R00218/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal autopsy is the standard method for investigating fetal death; however, it requires dissection of the fetus. Human fetal microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) provides a generally more acceptable and less invasive imaging alternative for bereaved parents to determine the cause of early pregnancy loss compared with conventional autopsy techniques. In this protocol, we describe the four main stages required to image fetuses using micro-CT. Preparation of the fetus includes staining with the contrast agent potassium triiodide and takes 3-19 d, depending on the size of the fetus and the time taken to obtain consent for the procedure. Setup for imaging requires appropriate positioning of the fetus and takes 1 h. The actual imaging takes, on average, 2 h 40 min and involves initial test scans followed by high-definition diagnostic scans. Postimaging, 3 d are required to postprocess the fetus, including removal of the stain, and also to undertake artifact recognition and data transfer. This procedure produces high-resolution isotropic datasets, allowing for radio-pathological interpretations to be made and long-term digital archiving for re-review and data sharing, where required. The protocol can be undertaken following appropriate training, which includes both the use of micro-CT techniques and handling of postmortem tissue.

Indexed as

X-Ray MicrotomographyAutopsyFetusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedStaining and LabelingTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33854254
OpenAlexW3155640781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.