Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854186›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2021

The p53-caspase-2 axis in the cell cycle and DNA damage response.

Yoon Lim, Loretta Dorstyn, Sharad Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Food science and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoon LimCentre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. yoon.lim@unisa.edu.au.
Loretta DorstynCentre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. loretta.dorstyn@unisa.edu.au.
Sharad KumarCentre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. sharad.kumar@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-9814
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caspase-2 was discovered almost three decades ago. It was one of the first two mammalian homologs of CED-3, the other being interleukin 1β-converting enzyme (ICE/caspase-1). Despite high similarity with CED-3 and its fly and mammalian counterparts (DRONC and caspase-9, respectively), the function of caspase-2 in apoptosis has remained enigmatic. A number of recent studies suggest that caspase-2 plays an important role in the regulation of p53 in response to cellular stress and DNA damage to prevent the proliferation and accumulation of damaged or aberrant cells. Here, we review these recent observations and their implications in caspase-2-mediated cellular death, senescence, and tumor suppression.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA DamageSignal TransductionAnimalsApoptosisCaspase 2Disease SusceptibilityEnzyme ActivationGene Expression RegulationHumansPhosphorylationPloidiesProtein StabilityStress, PhysiologicalTumor Suppressor Protein p53Caspase 2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID33854186
PMCPMC8102494
OpenAlexW3153400416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.