Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33854052›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

In situ architecture of neuronal α-Synuclein inclusions.

Victoria A Trinkaus, Irene Riera-Tur, Antonio Martínez-Sánchez, Felix J B Bäuerlein, Qiang Guo, Thomas Arzberger, Wolfgang Baumeister, Irina Dudanova, Mark S Hipp, F Ulrich Hartl and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structural Polymorphism of polyG Inclusions Revealed by In Situ Cryo-Electron Tomography.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Amyloid-mediated RNA uptake by sperm for embryonic delivery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Victoria A TrinkausDepartment of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Irene Riera-TurMolecular Neurodegeneration Group, Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2396-3921
Antonio Martínez-SánchezDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5865-2138
Felix J B BäuerleinDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8889-7371
Qiang GuoDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Thomas ArzbergerMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang BaumeisterDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Irina DudanovaMolecular Neurodegeneration Group, Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-8485
Mark S HippDepartment of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0497-3016
F Ulrich HartlDepartment of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. uhartl@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-135X
Rubén Fernández-BusnadiegoDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. ruben.fernandezbusnadiego@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8366-7622
Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology · DEMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular architecture of α-Synuclein (α-Syn) inclusions, pathognomonic of various neurodegenerative disorders, remains unclear. α-Syn inclusions were long thought to consist mainly of α-Syn fibrils, but recent reports pointed to intracellular membranes as the major inclusion component. Here, we use cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) to image neuronal α-Syn inclusions in situ at molecular resolution. We show that inclusions seeded by α-Syn aggregates produced recombinantly or purified from patient brain consist of α-Syn fibrils crisscrossing a variety of cellular organelles. Using gold-labeled seeds, we find that aggregate seeding is predominantly mediated by small α-Syn fibrils, from which cytoplasmic fibrils grow unidirectionally. Detailed analysis of membrane interactions revealed that α-Syn fibrils do not contact membranes directly, and that α-Syn does not drive membrane clustering. Altogether, we conclusively demonstrate that neuronal α-Syn inclusions consist of α-Syn fibrils intermixed with membranous organelles, and illuminate the mechanism of aggregate seeding and cellular interaction.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinBrainCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansInclusion BodiesMultiple System AtrophyNeuronsalpha-Synuclein

Identifiers

PMID33854052
PMCPMC8046968
OpenAlexW3156701803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.