ArticleBMJ open2021
Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral).
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- The impact of leaflet resection versus leaflet preservation on left ventricular reverse remodelling after mitral valve repair: insights from the UK mini mitral trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Trial
- Minimally invasive thoracoscopically-guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair: the UK Mini Mitral multicentre RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Trial
- Minithoracotomy vs Conventional Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA · 2023Trial
- Bronchial artery embolization for control of life-threatening endobronchial haemorrhage during cardiac surgery in a patient with microscopic polyangiitis: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Postoperative lactate trajectories predict in-hospital adverse outcomes and differ by surgical approach in cardiac surgery: a propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of mitral valve repair vs. replacement for mitral valve regurgitation.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Mid-term outcomes of robotic assisted versus conventional sternotomy for mitral valve replacement: a nationwide propensity-weighted analysis using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Use of accelerometry to measure the impact of remifentanil on sleep after mitral valve repair surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- One-year postprocedural quality of life following mitral valve surgery: data from The Netherlands heart registration.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between total thoracoscopic surgery and conventional full-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Building a successful minimally invasive mitral valve repair program before introducing the robotic approach: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Decision Making during the Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Focused Review for the Starting Minimally Invasive Surgeon.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNumbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches.There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure.The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up.Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years.The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13930454.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.