Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853673›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2021

Novel targetable FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations in glioblastoma associate with aggressive phenotype and distinct gene expression programs.

Maria-Magdalena Georgescu, Mohammad Zahidul Islam, Yan Li, James Traylor, Anil Nanda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Practical immunomodulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria-Magdalena GeorgescuNeuroMarkers PLLC, Houston, TX, 77025, USA. mmgeorgescu@yahoo.com.
Mohammad Zahidul IslamDepartment of Pathology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Yan LiDepartment of Pathology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
James TraylorDepartment of Pathology, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Anil NandaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Louisiana State University in Shreveport · USGenProMarkers (United States) · USRutgers New Jersey Medical School

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic molecular subgrouping of glioblastoma is an ongoing effort and the current classification includes IDH-wild-type and IDH-mutant entities, the latter showing significantly better prognosis. We performed a comparative integrated analysis of the FGFR glioblastoma subgroup consisting of 5 cases from a prospective 101-patient-cohort. FGFR alterations included FGFR2-TACC2 and FGFR2 amplifications arising in a multifocal IDH-mutant glioblastoma with unexpected 2.5-month patient survival, novel FGFR3 carboxy-terminal duplication and FGFR3-TLN1 fusion, and two previously described FGFR3-TACC3 fusions. The FGFR2 tumors showed additional mutations in SERPINE1/PAI-1 and MMP16, as part of extensive extracellular matrix remodeling programs. Whole transcriptomic analysis revealed common proliferation but distinct morphogenetic gene expression programs that correlated with tumor histology. The kinase program revealed EPHA3, LTK and ALK receptor tyrosine kinase overexpression in individual FGFR tumors. Paradoxically, all FGFR-fused glioblastomas shared strong PI3K and MAPK pathway suppression effected by SPRY, DUSP and AKAP12 inhibitors, whereas the FGFR2-TACC2 tumor elicited also EGFR suppression by ERRFI1 upregulation. This integrated analysis outlined the proliferation and morphogenetic expression programs in FGFR glioblastoma, and identified four novel, clinically targetable FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations that confer aggressive phenotype and trigger canonical pathway feedback inhibition, with important therapeutic implications.

Indexed as

AgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGene AmplificationGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, FusionPhenotypePrognosisProspective StudiesReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3TranscriptomeFGFR2 protein, humanFGFR3 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3FGFR2 amplificationFGFR2-TACC2FGFR3-TACC3FGFR3-TLN1Leptomeningeal gliomatosisMMPPAI-1ProteomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33853673
PMCPMC8048363
OpenAlexW3156457863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.