Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853658›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health systems2021

Enhancing psychological safety in mental health services.

D F Hunt, J Bailey, B R Lennox, M Crofts, C Vincent

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07075575 (Smoking Cessation Among Native Hawaiians), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07075575 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Smoking Cessation Among Native Hawaiians: A Test of Pharmacotherapies and Group-Based Counseling

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HawaiiRan2026 to 2028Enrolled75ConditionsTobacco Use Disorder, Smoking CessationArmsNicotine Polacrilex Gum (2 mg), Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy (CBGT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How can we measure psychological safety in mental healthcare staff? Developing questionnaire items using a nominal groups technique.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D F HuntDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. david.hunt@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-7368
J BaileyOxford School of Nursing and Midwifery, Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK.
B R LennoxOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Warneford Lane, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
M CroftsOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Warneford Lane, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
C VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological safety-speaking up about ideas and concerns, free from interpersonal risk-are essential to the high-risk environment, such as healthcare settings. Psychologically safe working is particularly important in mental health where recovery-oriented approaches rely on collaborative efforts of interprofessional teams to make complex decisions. Much research focuses on antecedents and outcomes associated with psychological safety, but little focus on the practical steps for how to increase psychological safety across and at different levels of a healthcare organisation.

aimsWe explore how a mental health organisation creates an organisation-wide plan for building the foundations of mental health and how to enhance psychological safety.

methodsThis review encompasses strategies across psychological safety and organisational culture change to increase psychological safety at an individual, team and organisational level. We set out a comprehensive overview of the types of strategies and interventions for increasing the ethos of psychological safety and setting the foundations for delivering an organisation-wide programme on this topic. We also provide a list of key targeted areas in mental health that would maximally benefit from increasing psychological safety-both in clinical and non-clinical settings.

conclusionsPsychological safety is a crucial determinant of safe and effective patient care in mental health services. This paper provides the key steps and considerations, creating a large-scale programme in psychological safety with a focus on mental health and drawing from the current literature, providing concrete steps for how our current understanding of psychological safety into practice.

Identifiers

PMID33853658
PMCPMC8045992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.