Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853635›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Monitoring advances including consent: learning from COVID-19 trials and other trials running in UKCRC registered clinical trials units during the pandemic.

Sharon B Love, Emma Armstrong, Carrie Bayliss, Melanie Boulter, Lisa Fox, Joanne Grumett, Patricia Rafferty, Barbara Temesi, Krista Wills, Andrea Corkhill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Monitoring strategies for clinical intervention studies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sharon B LoveMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ, London, UK. s.love@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-5390
Emma ArmstrongClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Carrie BaylissCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Coton House Level 6, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Melanie BoulterNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Lisa FoxThe Institute of Cancer Research - Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Joanne GrumettWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Patricia RaffertyNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Elliot Dynes Building, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Barbara TemesiManchester Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Krista WillsCancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 4TJ, UK.
Andrea CorkhillSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, MP131, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25351Cancer Research UK 25352Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected how clinical trials are managed, both within existing portfolios and for the rapidly developed COVID-19 trials. Sponsors or delegated organisations responsible for monitoring trials have needed to consider and implement alternative ways of working due to the national infection risk necessitating restricted movement of staff and public, reduced clinical staff resource as research staff moved to clinical areas, and amended working arrangements for sponsor and sponsor delegates as staff moved to working from home.Organisations have often worked in isolation to fast track mitigations required for the conduct of clinical trials during the pandemic; this paper describes many of the learnings from a group of monitoring leads based in United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTUs) within the UK.The UKCRC Monitoring Task and Finish Group, comprising monitoring leads from 9 CTUs, met repeatedly to identify how COVID-19 had affected clinical trial monitoring. Informed consent is included as a specific issue within this paper, as review of completed consent documentation is often required within trial monitoring plans (TMPs). Monitoring is defined as involving on-site monitoring, central monitoring or/and remote monitoring.Monitoring, required to protect the safety of the patients and the integrity of the trial and ensure the protocol is followed, is often best done by a combination of central, remote and on-site monitoring. However, if on-site monitoring is not possible, workable solutions can be found using only central or central and remote monitoring. eConsent, consent by a third person, or via remote means is plausible. Minimising datasets to the critical data reduces workload for sites and CTU staff. Home working caused by COVID-19 has made electronic trial master files (TMFs) more inviting. Allowing sites to book and attend protocol training at a time convenient to them has been successful and worth pursuing for trials with many sites in the future.The arrival of COVID-19 in the UK has forced consideration of and changes to how clinical trials are conducted in relation to monitoring. Some developed practices will be useful in other pandemics and others should be incorporated into regular use.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Informed ConsentHumansPandemicsUnited KingdomCentral monitoringConsentCOVID-19On-site monitoringRCTRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33853635
PMCPMC8045577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.