Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853574›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Occupational lifting and risk of hypertension, stratified by use of anti-hypertensives and age - a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study.

Mette Korshøj, Harald Hannerz, Ruth Frikke-Schmidt, Jacob L Marott, Peter Schnohr, Els Clays, Andreas Holtermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mette KorshøjNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. melars@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-9969
Harald HannerzNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ruth Frikke-SchmidtDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 5, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob L MarottCopenhagen City Heart Study, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Peter SchnohrCopenhagen City Heart Study, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Els ClaysDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Andreas HoltermannNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKGhent University · BENational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Arbejdstilsynet (DK) 20150067515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeavy occupational lifting is prevalent in the general working population and is sparsely reported to associate with hypertension, especially among older and hypertensive workers. We investigated if heavy occupational lifting is associated with hypertension and blood pressure (BP) in both cross-sectional and prospective study designs in the Copenhagen General Population Study, stratified by age, and use of anti-hypertensives.

methodsParticipation was conducted following the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethical committee (H-KF-01-144/01). By multivariable logistic and linear regression models, we investigated the association between heavy occupational lifting and hypertension, in a cross-sectional design (n = 67,363), using anti-hypertensives or BP ≥140/≥90 mmHg as outcome, and in a prospective design (n = 7020) with an above-median change in systolic BP (SBP) from baseline to follow-up and/or a shift from no use to use of anti-hypertensives as outcome, with and without stratification by age and use of anti-hypertensives.

resultsThe odds ratio for hypertension was estimated at 0.97 (99% CI: 0.93-1.00) in the cross-sectional analysis, and at 1.08 (99% CI: 0.98-1.19) in the prospective analysis. The difference in SBP among workers with versus without heavy occupational lifting was estimated at - 0.29 mmHg (99% CI -0.82 - 0.25) in the cross-sectional and at 1.02 mmHg (99% CI -0.41 - 2.45) in the prospective analysis. No significant interaction between heavy occupational lifting and age, nor use of anti-hypertensives were shown.

conclusionsOnly the prospective analysis indicated heavy occupational lifting to increase the risk of hypertension. Further research on the association between occupational lifting and hypertension are needed.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLiftingProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsAging workersBlue-collar occupationsCardiovascular riskErgonomicsOccupational health

Identifiers

PMID33853574
PMCPMC8045338
OpenAlexW3154632476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.