Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853523›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2021

Genetic diversity in global chicken breeds in relation to their genetic distances to wild populations.

Dorcus Kholofelo Malomane, Steffen Weigend, Armin Otto Schmitt, Annett Weigend, Christian Reimer, Henner Simianer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorcus Kholofelo MalomaneAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. dmaloma@gwdg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4577-0781
Steffen WeigendCenter for Integrated Breeding Research, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Armin Otto SchmittCenter for Integrated Breeding Research, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Annett WeigendInstitute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Neustadt, Germany.
Christian ReimerAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Henner SimianerAnimal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (DE) FKZ 0315528E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigration of a population from its founder population is expected to cause a reduction of its genetic diversity and facilitates differentiation between the population and its founder population, as predicted by the theory of genetic isolation by distance. Consistent with that theory, a model of expansion from a single founder predicts that patterns of genetic diversity in populations can be explained well by their geographic expansion from their founders, which is correlated with genetic differentiation.

methodsTo investigate this in chicken, we estimated the relationship between the genetic diversity of 160 domesticated chicken populations and their genetic distances to wild chicken populations.

resultsOur results show a strong inverse relationship, i.e. 88.6% of the variation in the overall genetic diversity of domesticated chicken populations was explained by their genetic distance to the wild populations. We also investigated whether the patterns of genetic diversity of different types of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genes are similar to that of the overall genome. Among the SNP classes, the non-synonymous SNPs deviated most from the overall genome. However, genetic distance to the wild chicken still explained more variation in domesticated chicken diversity across all SNP classes, which ranged from 83.0 to 89.3%.

conclusionsGenetic distance between domesticated chicken populations and their wild relatives can predict the genetic diversity of the domesticated populations. On the one hand, genes with little genetic variation across populations, regardless of the genetic distance to the wild population, are associated with major functions such as brain development. Changes in such genes may be detrimental to the species. On the other hand, genetic diversity seems to change at a faster rate within genes that are associated with e.g. protein transport and protein and lipid metabolic processes. In general, such genes may be flexible to changes according to the populations' needs. These results contribute to the knowledge of the evolutionary patterns of different functional genomic regions in the chicken.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsChickensDomesticationPhylogenySelective Breeding

Identifiers

PMID33853523
PMCPMC8048360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.