Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853441›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2021

e-ASPECTS software improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of interpretation of aspects score.

Waleed Brinjikji, Mehdi Abbasi, Catherine Arnold, John C Benson, Sherry A Braksick, Norbert Campeau, Carrie M Carr, Petrice M Cogswell, James P Klaas, Greta B Liebo and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Real-world evaluation of Brainomix e-Stroke software.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deep Learned Segmentations of Inflammation for Novel ⁹⁹Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-5524
Mehdi AbbasiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-2563
Catherine ArnoldDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John C BensonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-5422
Sherry A BraksickDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Norbert CampeauDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carrie M CarrDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Petrice M CogswellDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
James P KlaasDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Greta B LieboDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jason T LittleDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Patrick H LuetmerDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-7644
Steven A MessinaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alex A NagelschneiderDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kara M SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Christopher P WoodDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5580-9622
Deena M NasrDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-0040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is increased interest in the use of artificial intelligence-based (AI) software packages in the evaluation of neuroimaging studies for acute ischemic stroke. We studied whether, compared to standard image interpretation without AI, Brainomix e-ASPECTS software improved interobserver agreement and accuracy in detecting ASPECTS regions affected in anterior circulation LVO.

methodsWe included 60 consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO who had TICI 3 revascularization within 60 minutes of their baseline CT. A total of 16 readers, including senior neuroradiologists, junior neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists participated. Readers interpreted CT scans on independent workstations and assessed final ASPECTS and evaluated whether each individual ASPECTS region was affected. Two months later, readers again evaluated the CT scans, but with assistance of e-ASPECTS software. We assessed interclass correlation coefficient for total ASPECTS and interobserver agreement with Fleiss' Kappa for each ASPECTS region with and without assistance of the e-ASPECTS. We also assessed accuracy for the readers with and without e-ASPECTS assistance. In our assessment of accuracy, ground truth was the 24 hour CT in this cohort of patients who had prompt and complete revascularization.

resultsInterclass correlation coefficient for total ASPECTS without e-ASPECTS assistance was 0.395, indicating fair agreement compared, to 0.574 with e-ASPECTS assistance, indicating good agreement (P < 0.01). There was significant improvement in inter-rater agreement with e-ASPECTS assistance for each individual region with the exception of M6 and caudate. The e-ASPECTS software had higher accuracy than the overall cohort of readers (with and without e-ASPECTS assistance) for every region except the caudate.

conclusionsUse of Brainomix e-ASPECTS software resulted in significant improvements in inter-rater agreement and accuracy of ASPECTS score evaluation in a large group of neuroradiologists and neurologists. e-ASPECTS software was more predictive of final infarct/ASPECTS than the overall group interpreting the CT scans with and without e-ASPECTS assistance.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeArtificial IntelligenceHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSoftwareartificial intelligenceASPECTSCTlarge vessel occlusionStroke

Identifiers

PMID33853441
PMCPMC8673896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.