Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853267›Full record

ArticleJournal of audiology & otology2021

Quality of Life in Older Adults with Cochlear Implantation: Can It Be Equal to That of Healthy Older Adults?

Taskin Tokat, Togay Müderris, Ergul Basaran Bozkurt, Uğurtan Ergun, Abdulhalim Aysel, Tolgahan Catli

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of audiology & otology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taskin TokatDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
Togay MüderrisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Ergul Basaran BozkurtDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Uğurtan ErgunDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Abdulhalim AyselDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Tolgahan CatliDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Izmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the audiologic results after cochlear implantation (CI) in older patients and the degree of improvement in their quality of life (QoL). Subjects and.

methodsPatients over 65 years old who underwent CI at implant center in Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital were included in this study (n=54; 34 males and 20 females). The control group was patient over 65 years old with normal hearing (n=54; 34 males and 20 females). We administered three questionnaires [World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), World Health Organization Quality of Life-OLD (WHOQOL-OLD)], and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) to evaluate the QoL, CIrelated effects on activities of daily life, and social activities in all the subjects. Moreover, correlations between speech recognition and the QoL scores were evaluated. The duration of implant use and comorbidities were also examined as potential factors affecting QoL.

resultsThe patients had remarkable improvements (the mean score of postoperative speech perception 75.7%) in speech perception after CI. The scores for the WHOQOL-OLD and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire responses were similar in both the study and control groups, except those for a two subdomains (social relations and social participation). The patients with longer-term CI had higher scores than those with short-term CI use. In general, the changes in GDS scores were not significant (p<0.05).

conclusionsThe treatment of hearing loss with CI conferred significant improvement in patient's QoL (p<0.01). The evaluation of QoL can provide multidimensional insights into a geriatric patient's progress and, therefore, should be considered by audiologists.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantationHearing lossOlder adultsQuality of LifeSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID33853267
PMCPMC8311058
OpenAlexW3153157225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.