Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33853221›Full record

SynthesisAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2021

[Initial management of the patients with psychiatric involvement in hospital emergency departments: a systematic review].

A J Simonelli-Muñoz, J I Gallego-Gómez, N Fernández-García, J M Rivera-Caravaca

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Triggers of Agitation in Psychiatric Hospitalization Ward According to Professional Experience Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A J Simonelli-MuñozDepartamento de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Medicina. Universidad de Almería. Almería. España.. sma147@ual.es.
J I Gallego-Gómez
N Fernández-García
J M Rivera-Caravaca
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESUniversidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversity of Almería · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is a systematic review of studies that have investigated the initial management of patients with psychiatric conditions in hospital emergencies services in order to establish practical recommendations. A systematic review of the literature was carried out, consisting of studies published from 2010 to 2020, available in any language, consulting Cochrane Library Plus, PubMed, IBECS, LILACS and MEDLINE. The quality of the studies included in this review was assessed by the AMSTAR2 tool and the FCL 3.0 platform, together with the PRISMA statement. Results from the eleven papers selected showed that improvements in staff training, available resources, appropriate use of restraint and appropriate choice of medication can help to improve the care of patients with mental pathology in hospital emergency services. The same management for any other patient is recommended. However, if the patient is agitated or uncooperative, verbal, pharmacological and/or mechanical restraint (in this order) may be necessary. Keywords. Psychiatry. Psychomotor agitation. Crisis intervention. Hospital emergency service.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychomotor AgitationEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalsHumansRestraint, Physical

Identifiers

PMID33853221
PMCPMC10019535
OpenAlexW3152558697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.