Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33852803›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021

Compensating for a shifting world: evolving reference frames of visual and auditory signals across three multimodal brain areas.

Valeria C Caruso, Daniel S Pages, Marc A Sommer, Jennifer M Groh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Transformation from Retinotopic to Background-Centric Coordinates in the Macaque Precuneus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parametric information about eye movements is sent to the ears.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Conserved features of eye movement related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs) across humans and monkeys.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sound Localization of World and Head-Centered Space in Ferrets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valeria C CarusoDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-1296
Daniel S PagesDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Marc A SommerDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-763X
Jennifer M GrohDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

CRCNS: Integrative Information ProcessingR01NS050942 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GROH, JENNIFER M · 2004 to 2013
$2.6M
Information in Limited-Capacity Neural CodesR01DC013906 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GROH, JENNIFER M · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Spatial Information CodesR01DC016363 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GROH, JENNIFER M, TOKDAR, SURYA T · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013906NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016363NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulus locations are detected differently by different sensory systems, but ultimately they yield similar percepts and behavioral responses. How the brain transcends initial differences to compute similar codes is unclear. We quantitatively compared the reference frames of two sensory modalities, vision and audition, across three interconnected brain areas involved in generating saccades, namely the frontal eye fields (FEF), lateral and medial parietal cortex (M/LIP), and superior colliculus (SC). We recorded from single neurons in head-restrained monkeys performing auditory- and visually guided saccades from variable initial fixation locations and evaluated whether their receptive fields were better described as eye-centered, head-centered, or hybrid (i.e. not anchored uniquely to head- or eye-orientation). We found a progression of reference frames across areas and across time, with considerable hybrid-ness and persistent differences between modalities during most epochs/brain regions. For both modalities, the SC was more eye-centered than the FEF, which in turn was more eye-centered than the predominantly hybrid M/LIP. In all three areas and temporal epochs from stimulus onset to movement, visual signals were more eye-centered than auditory signals. In the SC and FEF, auditory signals became more eye-centered at the time of the saccade than they were initially after stimulus onset, but only in the SC at the time of the saccade did the auditory signals become "predominantly" eye-centered. The results indicate that visual and auditory signals both undergo transformations, ultimately reaching the same final reference frame but via different dynamics across brain regions and time.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionFrontal LobeMacaca mulattaParietal LobePhotic StimulationSaccadesSuperior ColliculiTime FactorsVisual Perceptioncoordinate transformationsfrontal eye field (FEF)intraparietal cortex (LIPMIP)multisensorysuperior colliculus (SC)

Identifiers

PMID33852803
PMCPMC8325605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.