Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33852642›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

COVID-19: Short term prediction model using daily incidence data.

Hongwei Zhao, Naveed N Merchant, Alyssa McNulty, Tiffany A Radcliff, Murray J Cote, Rebecca S B Fischer, Huiyan Sang, Marcia G Ory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial intelligence: Potential tool to subside SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Process biochemistry (Barking, London, England) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongwei ZhaoSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-8694
Naveed N MerchantDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.
Alyssa McNultySchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4281-8236
Tiffany A RadcliffSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.
Murray J CoteSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.
Rebecca S B FischerSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.
Huiyan SangDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.
Marcia G OrySchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United Stated of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8036-2383

Funding

Investigation into the Epidemic of Unexplained Kidney Disease in Nicaragua: Understanding the Acute Clinical Scenario and Natural History of Disease in Mesoamerican Nephropathy.K01TW010863 · FIC · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI FISCHER, REBECCA SUSANN BRYSON · 2018 to 2022
$692k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW010863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction of the dynamics of new SARS-CoV-2 infections during the current COVID-19 pandemic is critical for public health planning of efficient health care allocation and monitoring the effects of policy interventions. We describe a new approach that forecasts the number of incident cases in the near future given past occurrences using only a small number of assumptions.

methodsOur approach to forecasting future COVID-19 cases involves 1) modeling the observed incidence cases using a Poisson distribution for the daily incidence number, and a gamma distribution for the series interval; 2) estimating the effective reproduction number assuming its value stays constant during a short time interval; and 3) drawing future incidence cases from their posterior distributions, assuming that the current transmission rate will stay the same, or change by a certain degree.

resultsWe apply our method to predicting the number of new COVID-19 cases in a single state in the U.S. and for a subset of counties within the state to demonstrate the utility of this method at varying scales of prediction. Our method produces reasonably accurate results when the effective reproduction number is distributed similarly in the future as in the past. Large deviations from the predicted results can imply that a change in policy or some other factors have occurred that have dramatically altered the disease transmission over time.

conclusionWe presented a modelling approach that we believe can be easily adopted by others, and immediately useful for local or state planning.

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberCOVID-19Disease Transmission, InfectiousForecastingHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalPandemicsPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID33852642
PMCPMC8046206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.