Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33852629›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Recent HIV infection among pregnant women in the 2017 antenatal sentinel cross-sectional survey, South Africa: Assay-based incidence measurement.

Selamawit Woldesenbet, Tendesayi Kufa-Chakezha, Carl Lombard, Samuel Manda, Mireille Cheyip, Kassahun Ayalew, Brian Chirombo, Peter Barron, Karidia Diallo, Bharat Parekh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Selamawit WoldesenbetCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-3561
Tendesayi Kufa-ChakezhaCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Carl LombardBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2136-6533
Samuel MandaBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mireille CheyipStrategic Information Unit, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Kassahun AyalewStrategic Information Unit, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Brian ChiromboHIV and Hepatitis Program, World Health Organization, Pretoria, South Africa.
Peter BarronSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Karidia DialloLaboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Bharat ParekhDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, International Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Adrian PurenCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZACenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNew HIV infection during pre-conception and pregnancy is a significant contributor of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa. This study estimated HIV incidence (defined as new infection within the last one year from the time of the survey which included both new infections occurred during pregnancy or just before pregnancy) among pregnant women and described the characteristics of recently infected pregnant women at national level.

methodsBetween 1 October and 15 November 2017, we conducted a national cross-sectional survey among pregnant women aged 15-49 years old attending antenatal care at 1,595 public facilities. Blood specimens were collected from pregnant women and tested for HIV in a centralised laboratory. Plasma viral load and Limiting Antigen Avidity Enzyme Immunosorbent Assay (LAg) tests were further performed on HIV positive specimens to differentiate between recent and long-term infections. Recent infection was defined as infection that occurred within one year from the date of collection of blood specimen for the survey. Data on age, age of partner, and marital status were collected through interviews. Women whose specimens were classified as recent by LAg assay and with viral loads >1,000 copies/mL were considered as recently infected. The calculated proportion of HIV positive women with recent infection was adjusted for assay-specific parameters to estimate annual incidence. Survey multinomial logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with being recently infected using HIV negative women as a reference group. Age-disparate relationship was defined as having a partner 5 or more years older.

resultsOf 10,049 HIV positive participants with LAg and viral load data, 1.4% (136) were identified as recently infected. The annual HIV incidence was 1.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-1.7). In multivariable analyses, being single (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.8-6.2) or cohabiting (aOR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.8-7.7), compared to being married as well as being in an age-disparate relationship among young women (aOR: 3.1, 95% CI: 2.0-4.7; reference group: young women (15-24years) whose partners were not 5 years or more older) were associated with higher odds of recent infection.

conclusionsCompared to previous studies among pregnant women, the incidence estimated in this study was substantially lower. However, the UNAIDS target to reduce incidence by 75% by 2020 (which is equivalent to reducing incidence to <1%) has not been met. The implementation of HIV prevention and treatment interventions should be intensified, targeting young women engaged in age-disparate relationship and unmarried women to fast track progress towards the UNAIDS target.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOdds RatioPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID33852629
PMCPMC8046194
OpenAlexW3156912123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.