Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33852580›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Versatile and flexible microfluidic qPCR test for high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 and cellular response detection in nasopharyngeal swab samples.

Julien Fassy, Caroline Lacoux, Sylvie Leroy, Latifa Noussair, Sylvain Hubac, Aurélien Degoutte, Georges Vassaux, Vianney Leclercq, David Rouquié, Charles-Hugo Marquette and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julien FassyUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, FHU-OncoAge, Valbonne, France.
Caroline LacouxUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, FHU-OncoAge, Valbonne, France.
Sylvie LeroyUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, FHU-OncoAge, Valbonne, France.
Latifa NoussairAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GHU Paris-Saclay, Garches, France.
Sylvain HubacInstitut de Recherche Criminelle de la Gendarmerie Nationale (IRCGN), Cergy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-5660
Aurélien DegoutteDépartement de Pneumologie, CHU-Nice, FHU-OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Georges VassauxUniversité Côte d'Azur, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Valbonne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1149-7716
Vianney LeclercqLBM BIOESTEREL, Mouans-Sartoux, France.
David RouquiéBayer SAS, Valbonne, France.
Charles-Hugo MarquetteDépartement de Pneumologie, CHU-Nice, FHU-OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-9941
Martin RottmanAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GHU Paris-Saclay, Garches, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5953-3344
Patrick TouronInstitut de Recherche Criminelle de la Gendarmerie Nationale (IRCGN), Cergy, France.
Antoinette LemoineAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GHU Paris-Saclay, Garches, France.
Jean-Louis HerrmannAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GHU Paris-Saclay, Garches, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2347-6418
Pascal BarbryUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, FHU-OncoAge, Valbonne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9632-6483
Jean-Louis NahonUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, FHU-OncoAge, Valbonne, France.
Laure-Emmanuelle ZaragosiUniversité Côte d'Azur, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Valbonne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6747-7928
Bernard MariUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, FHU-OncoAge, Valbonne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-9182
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRGendarmerie Nationale · FRInserm · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRBayer (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence and quick spread of SARS-CoV-2 has pointed at a low capacity response for testing large populations in many countries, in line of material, technical and staff limitations. The traditional RT-qPCR diagnostic test remains the reference method and is by far the most widely used test. These assays are limited to a few probe sets, require large sample PCR reaction volumes, along with an expensive and time-consuming RNA extraction step. Here we describe a quantitative nanofluidic assay that overcomes some of these shortcomings, based on the BiomarkTM instrument from Fluidigm. This system offers the possibility of performing 4608 qPCR end-points in a single run, equivalent to 192 clinical samples combined with 12 pairs of primers/probe sets in duplicate, thus allowing the monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 including the detection of specific SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as the detection other pathogens and/or host cellular responses (virus receptors, response markers, microRNAs). The 10 nL-range volume of BiomarkTM reactions is compatible with sensitive and reproducible reactions that can be easily and cost-effectively adapted to various RT-qPCR configurations and sets of primers/probe. Finally, we also evaluated the use of inactivating lysis buffers composed of various detergents in the presence or absence of proteinase K to assess the compatibility of these buffers with a direct reverse transcription enzymatic step and we propose several protocols, bypassing the need for RNA purification. We advocate that the combined utilization of an optimized processing buffer and a high-throughput real-time PCR device would contribute to improve the turn-around-time to deliver the test results to patients and increase the SARS-CoV-2 testing capacities.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDNA PrimersFemaleHumansMaleMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroRNAsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingDNA PrimersMicroRNAsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33852580
PMCPMC8046349
OpenAlexW3155375778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.