ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2021
Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the genetic potential of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal) germplasm through SCoT and EST-SSR molecular markers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Start codon targeted (SCoT) based molecular diversity and population structure analysis in black turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genetic differentiation and conservation insights into Salicornia iranica subsp. sinus-persica from Musa Bay using SCoT markers and DNA barcodes.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Analytical assessment of physical characteristics, metabolic processes, and molecular investigations of selected wheat (Triticum spp.) cultivars.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of Indian blackberry (Syzygium cumini L.) using CAAT box‑derived polymorphism (CBDP) and start codon targeted polymorphism (SCoT) markers.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Integrative morphological, phytochemical, and molecular identification of three invasive and medicinal Reynoutria species.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigation of genetic diversity of Iranian wild relatives of bread wheat using ISSR and SSR markers.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023Article
- InDel and SCoT Markers for Genetic Diversity Analysis in a Citrus Collection from the Western Caucasus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Analysis of genetic diversity among common bean germplasm by start codon targeted (SCoT) markers.Molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- An Analysis of Genetic Variability and Population Structure in Wheat Germplasm Using Microsatellite and Gene-Based Markers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Transferability of ISSR, SCoT and SSR Markers forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crassa species using 30 CAAT box-derived polymorphism (CBDP) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers.
resultsFifteen SCoT and Fifteen CBDP primers produced 262 and 298 fragments which all of them were polymorphic, respectively. The number of polymorphic bands (NPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (Rp), and marker index (MI) for SCoT primers ranged from 14 to 23, 0.31 to 0.39, 2.55 to 7.49, and 7.56 to 14.46 with an average of 17.47, 0.34, 10.44, and 5.69, respectively, whereas these values for CBDP primers were 15 to 26, 0.28 to 0.36, 3.82 to 6.94, and 4.74 to 7.96 with a mean of 19.87, 0.31, 5.35, and 6.24, respectively. Based on both marker systems, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the portion of genetic diversity within species was more than among them. In both analyses, the highest values of the number of observed (Na) and effective alleles (Ne), Nei's gene diversity (He), and Shannon's information index (I) were estimated for Ae. cylindrica species.
conclusionThe results of cluster analysis and population structure showed that SCoT and CBDP markers grouped all samples based on their genomic constitutions. In conclusion, the used markers are very effective techniques for the evaluation of the genetic diversity in wild relatives of wheat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.