Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33852052›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

[E-Learning in pathology].

Amelie Friederike Büttcher, Philipp Ströbel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amelie Friederike BüttcherStudiendekanat, Bereich Medizindidaktik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Philipp StröbelInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. philipp.stroebel@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital formats have become an indispensable part of academic teaching, including education and training in pathology. Their use offers the perspective of rendering conventional teaching formats more diversified and more flexible since students can adopt the timing and learning speed to their individual needs. However, digital formats should be designed to fulfill the intended didactic purpose within a teaching concept that addresses competences and specific aims. The current view is that E‑learning neither will nor should replace face-to-face teaching, but that both can fuse into blended-learning formats using the best of both worlds. It is important to view the implementation of E‑learning as a dynamic process that should be underpinned by didactic research and be constantly developed further through evaluation and feedback from both teachers and students.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumHumansComputer-assisted instructionDistance educationFeedbackMedical studentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID33852052
PMCPMC8044288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.