ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Uncertainty measurement of radiomics features against inherent quantum noise in computed tomography imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning, radiomics and radiogenomics applications in the digital breast tomosynthesis: a systematic review.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- A novel multimodal AI-based radiomics approach for precision assessment of pain intensity in chronic nonspecific low back pain.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven radiomics study in cancer: the role of feature engineering and modeling.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
- Robustness of radiomics features of virtual unenhanced and virtual monoenergetic images in dual-energy CT among different imaging platforms and potential role of CT number variability.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Impact of improved spatial resolution on radiomic features using photon-counting-detector CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesQuantum noise is a random process in X-ray-based imaging systems. We addressed and measured the uncertainty of radiomics features against this quantum noise in computed tomography (CT) images.
methodsA clinical multi-detector CT scanner, two homogeneous phantom sets, and four heterogeneous samples were used. A solid tumor tissue removed from a male BALB/c mouse was included. We the placed phantom sets on the CT scanning table and repeated 20 acquisitions with identical imaging settings. Regions of interest were delineated for feature extraction. Statistical quantities-average, standard deviation, and percentage uncertainty-were calculated from these 20 repeated scans. Percentage uncertainty was used to measure and quantify feature stability against quantum noise. Twelve radiomics features were measured. Random noise was added to study the robustness of machine learning classifiers against feature uncertainty.
resultsWe found the ranges of percentage uncertainties from homogeneous soft tissue phantoms, homogeneous bone phantoms, and solid tumor tissue to be 0.01-2138%, 0.02-15%, and 0.18-16%, respectively. Overall, it was found that the CT features ShortRunHighGrayLevelEmpha (SRHGE) (0.01-0.18%), ShortRunLowGrayLevelEmpha (SRLGE) (0.01-0.41%), LowGrayLevelRunEmpha (LGRE) (0.01-0.39%), and LongRunLowGrayLevelEmpha (LRLGE) (0.02-0.66%) were the most stable features against the inherent quantum noise. The most unstable features were cluster shade (1-2138%) and max probability (1-16%). The impact of random noise to the prediction accuracy by different machine learning classifiers was found to be between 0 and 12%.
conclusionsTwelve features were used for uncertainty measurements. The upper and lower bounds of percentage uncertainties were determined. The quantum noise effect on machine learning classifiers is model dependent. KEY POINTS: • Quantum noise is a random process and is intrinsic to X-ray-based imaging systems. This inherent quantum noise creates unpredictable fluctuations in the gray-level intensities of image pixels. Extra cautions and further validations are strongly recommended when unstable radiomics features are selected by a predictive model for disease classification or treatment outcome prognosis. • We addressed and used the statistical quantity of percentage uncertainty to measure the uncertainty of radiomics features against the inherent quantum noise in computed tomography (CT) images. • A clinical multi-detector CT scanner, two homogeneous phantom sets, and four heterogeneous samples were used in the stability measurement. A solid tumor tissue removed from a male BALB/c mouse was included in the heterogeneous sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33852047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.