Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33852041›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022

Urinary microbiota of women with recurrent urinary tract infection: collection and culture methods.

Baylie R Hochstedler, Lindsey Burnett, Travis K Price, Carrie Jung, Alan J Wolfe, Linda Brubaker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. More than an infection: the ecological puzzle of recurrent urinary tract infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Complete genome sequence of vaginal swab isolateMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Draft genomes ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  11. Draft genomes ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  12. Draft genome sequences of fourMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  13. Draft genomes of oneMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Baylie R HochstedlerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
Lindsey BurnettDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Travis K PriceDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
Carrie JungDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Alan J WolfeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA. awolfe@luc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-0545
Linda BrubakerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Loyola University Chicago · USUniversity of California San Diego · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

The Female Urinary Microbiome and Urinary IncontinenceR01DK104718 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA, WOLFE, ALAN J · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104718NIH HHS R01 DK104718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisMany clinicians utilize standard culture of voided urine to guide treatment for women with recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTI). However, despite antibiotic treatment, symptoms may persist and events frequently recur. The cyclic nature and ineffective treatment of RUTI suggest that underlying uropathogens pass undetected because of the preferential growth of Escherichia coli. Expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) detects more clinically relevant microbes. The objective of this study was to assess how urine collection and culture methods influence microbial detection in RUTI patients.

methodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled symptomatic adult women with an established RUTI diagnosis. Participants contributed both midstream voided and catheterized urine specimens for culture via both standard urine culture (SUC) and EQUC. Presence and abundance of microbiota were compared between culture and collection methods.

resultsForty-three symptomatic women participants (mean age 67 years) contributed specimens. Compared to SUC, EQUC detected more unique bacterial species and consistently detected more uropathogens from catheterized and voided urine specimens. For both collection methods, the most commonly detected uropathogens by EQUC were E. coli (catheterized: n = 8, voided: n = 12) and E. faecalis (catheterized: n = 7, voided: n = 17). Compared to catheterized urine samples assessed by EQUC, SUC often missed uropathogens, and culture of voided urines by either method yielded high false-positive rates.

conclusionsIn women with symptomatic RUTI, SUC and assessment of voided urines have clinically relevant limitations in uropathogen detection. These results suggest that, in this population, catheterized specimens analyzed via EQUC provide clinically relevant information for appropriate diagnosis.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliFemaleHumansUrinalysisEnhanced urine cultureRecurrent urinary tract infectionUrinary microbiomeUrinary pathogen detectionUrine collection

Identifiers

PMID33852041
PMCPMC8514570
OpenAlexW3154907379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.