Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851986›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Targeted use of intraoperative frozen-section analysis lowers the frequency of completion thyroidectomy.

J I Staubitz, I Elmrich, P B Musholt, R J A Cámara, F Watzka, H Dralle, C Sekulla, K Lorenz, T J Musholt, Prospective Evaluation Study Thyroid Surgery (PETS) 2 study group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. [Frozen section in oncologic endocrine surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Frozen Section Examination in Thyroid Surgery.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J I StaubitzSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
I ElmrichSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
P B MusholtSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
R J A CámaraInstitute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
F WatzkaSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
H DralleDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Centre Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
C SekullaDepartment of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Centre Halle (Saale), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
K LorenzDepartment of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Centre Halle (Saale), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
T J MusholtSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Prospective Evaluation Study Thyroid Surgery (PETS) 2 study group
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of intraoperative frozen section (iFS) analysis on the frequency of completion thyroidectomy for the management of thyroid carcinoma is controversial. Although specialized endocrine centres have published their respective results, there are insufficient data from primary and secondary healthcare levels. The aim of this study was to analyse the utility of iFS analysis.

methodsIn the Prospective Evaluation Study Thyroid Surgery (PETS) 2 study, 22 011 operations for benign and malignant thyroid disease were registered prospectively in 68 European hospitals from 1 July 2010 to 31 December 2012. Group 1 consisted of 569 patients from University Medical Centre (UMC) Mainz, and group 2 comprised 21 442 patients from other PETS 2 participating hospitals. UMC Mainz exercised targeted but liberal use of iFS analysis for suspected malignant nodules. iFS analysis was compared with standard histological examination regarding the correct distinction between benign and malignant disease. The percentage of completion thyroidectomies was assessed for the participating hospitals.

resultsiFS analysis was performed in 35.70 per cent of patients in group 1 versus 21.80 per cent of those in group 2 (risk ratio (RR) 1.6, 95 per cent c.i. 1.5 to 1.8; P < 0.001). Sensitivity of iFS analysis was 75.0 per cent in group 1 versus 63.50 per cent in group 2 (RR 1.2, 1.2 to 1.3; P = 0.040). Completion surgery was necessary in 8.10 per cent of patients in group 1 versus 20.8 per cent of those in group 2 (RR 0.4, 0.2 to 0.7; P = 0.001).

conclusioniFS analysis is a useful tool in determining the appropriate surgical management of thyroid disease. Targeted use of iFS was associated with a significantly higher sensitivity for the detection of malignancy, and with a significantly reduced necessity for completion surgery.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansIntraoperative CareMaleProspective StudiesThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid Nodule

Identifiers

PMID33851986
PMCPMC8045471
OpenAlexW3154267785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.