Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851931›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Virtual Reality-Based Psychotherapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: fMRI Study Using a Self-Referential Task.

Ji-Won Hur, Hyemin Shin, Dooyoung Jung, Heon-Jeong Lee, Sungkil Lee, Gerard J Kim, Chung-Yean Cho, Seungmoon Choi, Seung-Moo Lee, Chul-Hyun Cho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Neural circuit basis of pathological anxiety.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ji-Won HurSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-7365
Hyemin ShinSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-0188
Dooyoung JungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-4847
Heon-Jeong LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-2383
Sungkil LeeDepartment of Software, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-9382
Gerard J KimDigital Experience Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-8021
Chung-Yean ChoDepartment of Film & Multimedia, Korea National University of Arts, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-2535
Seungmoon ChoiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5889-1083
Seung-Moo LeeDepartment of Film & Multimedia, Korea National University of Arts, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-353X
Chul-Hyun ChoDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-9680
Chungnam National University · KRKorea University · KRPohang University of Science and Technology · KRKorea National University of Arts · KRUlsan National Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough it has been well demonstrated that the efficacy of virtual reality therapy for social anxiety disorder is comparable to that of traditional cognitive behavioral therapy, little is known about the effect of virtual reality on pathological self-referential processes in individuals with social anxiety disorder.

objectiveWe aimed to determine changes in self-referential processing and their neural mechanisms following virtual reality treatment.

methodsWe recruited participants with and without a primary diagnosis of social anxiety disorder to undergo clinical assessments (Social Phobia Scale and Post-Event Rumination Scale) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans. Participants with social anxiety disorder received virtual reality-based exposure treatment for 6 sessions starting immediately after baseline testing. After the sixth session, participants with social anxiety disorder completed follow-up scans during which they were asked to judge whether a series of words (positive, negative, neutral) was relevant to them.

resultsOf 25 individuals with social anxiety disorder who participated in the study, 21 completed the sessions and follow-up; 22 control individuals also participated. There were no significant differences in age (P=.36), sex (P=.71), or handedness (P=.51) between the groups. Whole-brain analysis revealed that participants in the social anxiety disorder group had increased neural responses during positive self-referential processing in the medial temporal and frontal cortexes compared with those in the control group. Participants in the social anxiety disorder group also showed increased left insular activation and decreased right middle frontal gyrus activation during negative self-referential processing. After undergoing virtual reality-based therapy, overall symptoms of the participants with social anxiety disorder were reduced, and these participants exhibited greater activity in a brain regions responsible for self-referential and autobiographical memory processes while viewing positive words during postintervention fMRI scans. Interestingly, the greater the blood oxygen level dependent changes related to positive self-referential processing, the lower the tendency to ruminate on the negative events and the lower the social anxiety following the virtual reality session. Compared with that at baseline, higher activation was also found within broad somatosensory areas in individuals with social anxiety disorder during negative self-referential processing following virtual reality therapy.

conclusionsThese fMRI findings might reflect the enhanced physiological and cognitive processing in individuals with social anxiety disorder in response to self-referential information. They also provide neural evidence of the effect of virtual reality exposure therapy on social anxiety and self-derogation.

Indexed as

exposure therapyfMRIsocial anxietysocial phobiaunctional magnetic resonance imagingvirtual realityVR

Identifiers

PMID33851931
PMCPMC8082384
OpenAlexW3136038231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.