Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851925›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Participant Perceptions of Facilitators and Barriers to Adherence in a Digital Mental Health Intervention for a Nonclinical Cohort: Content Analysis.

Melanie Elise Renfrew, Darren Peter Morton, Maria Northcote, Jason Kyle Morton, Jason Scott Hinze, Geraldine Przybylko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie Elise RenfrewLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-3994
Darren Peter MortonLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-7838
Maria NorthcoteLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-9669
Jason Kyle MortonLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6611-6135
Jason Scott HinzeLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4716-4873
Geraldine PrzybylkoLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1383-5392
Avondale University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital mental health promotion interventions (MHPIs) present a scalable opportunity to attenuate the risk of mental health distress among nonclinical cohorts. However, adherence is frequently suboptimal, and little is known about participants' perspectives concerning facilitators and barriers to adherence in community-based settings.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine participants' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to adherence in a web- and mobile app-based MHPI for a nonclinical cohort.

methodsThis qualitative study used inductive, reflexive thematic analysis to explore free-text responses in a postintervention evaluation of a 10-week digital MHPI. The intervention was administered using a web and mobile app from September to December 2018. Participants (N=320) were Australian and New Zealand members of a faith-based organization who self-selected into the study, owned a mobile phone with messaging capability, had an email address and internet access, were fluent in English, provided informed consent, and gave permission for their data to be used for research. The postintervention questionnaire elicited participants' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to adherence during the intervention period.

resultsKey factors that facilitated adherence were engaging content, time availability and management, ease of accessibility, easy or enjoyable practical challenges, high perceived value, and personal motivation to complete the intervention. The primary perceived barrier to adherence was the participants' lack of time. Other barriers included completing and recording practical activities, length of video content, technical difficulties, and a combination of personal factors.

conclusionsTime scarcity was the foremost issue for the nonclinical cohort engaged in this digital MHPI. Program developers should streamline digital interventions to minimize the time investment for participants. This may include condensed content, optimization of intuitive web and app design, simplified recording of activities, and greater participant autonomy in choosing optional features. Nonetheless, participants identified a multiplicity of other interindividual factors that facilitated or inhibited adherence.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsText MessagingAustraliaHumansMental HealthPerceptionadherenceeHealthhealth promotionmobile phoneparticipant perceptionsweb-based mental health

Identifiers

PMID33851925
PMCPMC8082377
OpenAlexW3153632074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.