Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851734›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2021

Mindfulness and acceptance-based behavioral treatment for bulimia-spectrum disorders: A pilot feasibility randomized trial.

Adrienne S Juarascio, Megan N Parker, Rowan Hunt, Helen Burton Murray, Emily K Presseller, Stephanie M Manasse

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Emotion-Related Treatments in Patients With Binge Eating Episodes-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-Eating Disorder Across the Lifespan.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrienne S JuarascioDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Megan N ParkerDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Rowan HuntDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7626-7049
Helen Burton MurrayDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-3256
Emily K PressellerDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6854-1207
Stephanie M ManasseCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Addressing Weight History to Improve Behavioral Treatments for Bulimia NervosaK23MH105680 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI JUARASCIO, ADRIENNE SARAH · 2015 to 2018
$644k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH105680NIMH NIH HHS K23MH105680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough existing research supports the efficacy of mindfulness- and acceptance-based treatments (MABTs) for eating disorders (EDs), few studies have directly compared outcomes from MABTs to standard CBT.

methodParticipants (N = 44), treatment-seeking adults with bulimia-spectrum EDs, were screened for eligibility, consented, and randomized to receive 20 sessions of outpatient, individual CBT or MABT treatment. Treatment outcomes (binge eating and compensatory behavior episodes, global ED severity, depressive symptoms, quality of life, emotional awareness/clarity, distress tolerance, values-based decision-making, and emotion modulation) were measured at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6-month follow up. Data on feasibility and acceptability are also presented.

resultsTreatment and assessment retention rates were comparable between MABT and CBT (p range = .51-.73) and between-group differences on acceptability measures were very small (d range = 0.03-0.19). Both conditions produced notable and generally comparable changes in most treatment outcomes at post-treatment (within group d range = 0.06-1.77). DISCUSSION: The MABT and CBT conditions demonstrated comparable degrees of feasibility, acceptability, and symptom improvement, suggesting that MABTs warrant further evaluation as ED treatments.

Indexed as

Bulimia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyMindfulnessAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomebulimia nervosamindfulness and acceptance-based treatmenttreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33851734
PMCPMC8780759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.