Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851548›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2021

The safety and efficacy of day-case total joint arthroplasty.

S Dey, R Gadde, A Sobti, N Macdonald, J Jacob, A Unnithan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S DeyAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
R GaddeAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
A SobtiAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
N MacdonaldAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J JacobAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
A UnnithanAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe popularity of day-case arthroplasty has been fuelled by focus on its cost effectiveness for the healthcare system. Safety concerns still remain. The aim of this review was to compare readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty for patients undergoing day-case surgery and for inpatients.

methodsA comprehensive online search of databases was performed for all published articles in the English language evaluating readmission rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Seventeen studies were deemed eligible and included in the meta-analysis.

resultsAll studies included in the meta-analysis described readmission rates following THA/TKA. The readmission rate for day-case patients was 1.9% (

conclusionsThis review emphasises that with a thoughtful, designated protocol and with careful patient selection, day-case arthroplasty is a safe and effective option.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDatabases, FactualHumansPatient ReadmissionTreatment OutcomeArthroplastyDay caseDay surgeryEnhanced recoveryFast trackOutpatientSame day

Identifiers

PMID33851548
PMCPMC10335200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.