ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2021
The role of laparoscopic surgery in repeat ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of conversion and outcomes after conversion in laparoscopic redo ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Robotic vs. laparoscopic redo ileocolonic resection for recurrent Crohn's disease.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of advanced therapies on surgical recurrence following second ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Management of Complicated and Re-operative Crohn's Disease.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Crohn's Disease Complicated by Retroperitoneal Abscess and Fistula Treated with Single-Incision Laparoscopic Subtotal Colectomy: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Outcomes of surgical treatment for enterovesical fistula in Crohn's disease.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Landscape of surgery in Crohn's disease across twenty years: insights from machine learning.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Biological therapy prior to repeat ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease can reduce the postoperative complication rate.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Risk factors and predictors of 30-day complications and conversion to open surgery after repeat ileocolic resection of Crohn's disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Perioperative optimization of Crohn's disease.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023Review
- The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease: A comparative clinical study of over 100 consecutive patients.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimLaparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for primary uncomplicated ileocolic resection (ICR); however, its role for repeat resections is unclear. This study assessed the outcomes of primary and repeated ICRs for Crohn's disease to examine rates of laparoscopy and patient morbidity.
methodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted at a tertiary centre between 2013 and 2019. All patients undergoing ICRs for Crohn's disease were included. The cohort was divided into three groups based on number of resections-primary (1R), secondary (2R) and tertiary or more (>2R) groups. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity.
resultsOver a 6-year period, 474 patients underwent ICR for Crohn's disease, including 369 primary (1R, 77.8%) and 105 repeat (≥2R, 22.2%) resections. A laparoscopic approach was less common in the ≥2R versus 1R groups (79.0% vs. 93.8%, P < 0.001), but rates of conversion to an open procedure were comparable. Morbidity was higher amongst repeat resections although this was not significant (20.0% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.18). Amongst cases approached laparoscopically (n = 429), rates of conversion and postoperative morbidity did not differ by stage of resection, although operative time was longer for repeat operations. Even in the group undergoing laparoscopy for tertiary or greater resections (>2R, n = 29), the rates of conversion (10%) and morbidity (14%) were relatively low.
conclusionIn this contemporary series of primary and reoperative ICR for ileal CD, a laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe for the majority of repeat ICRs when performed at a high volume centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.