Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851490›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2021

Social support and siblings of children with cancer: A scoping review.

Sarah E Wawrzynski, Megan R Schaefer, Nena Schvaneveldt, Melissa A Alderfer

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E WawrzynskiIntermountain Primary Children's Hospital, Pediatric Critical Care Services, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2756-2583
Megan R SchaeferDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-7773
Nena SchvaneveldtEccles Health Science Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5250-6298
Melissa A AlderferCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System and Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-1693
Primary Children's Hospital · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Social media use and social support among adolescent siblings of children with cancerF31NR018987 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WAWRZYNSKI, SARAH E · 2019 to 2022
$101k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR018987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocial support is essential in healthy adjustment to life stressors. This scoping review examines how social support has been conceptualized, operationalized, and studied among siblings of children with cancer. Gaps in the current literature are identified, and future research directions are proposed.

methodsA rigorous systematic scoping review framework guided our process. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for literature regarding social support and siblings of children with cancer. After screening, 57 articles were identified (n = 26 quantitative, n = 21 qualitative, and n = 10 multi-method) and their content extracted for summarization.

resultsThe majority of studies (n = 43, 75.4%) were descriptive; 14 (24.6%) included interventions, and of those, four were experimental. Few studies used a clearly defined theoretical framework, or validated tools to measure social support. Studies explored perceived social support needs of siblings, the provision and availability of formal support through interventions and related outcomes, and informal family social supports. A variety of support types were found to be helpful to siblings in different ways.

conclusionsSocial support is a prevalent topic in the literature regarding siblings of children with cancer. It is unclear what types of support are most important due to how it has been conceptualized and measured. Despite some methodological limitations, greater levels of social support have been linked to better adaptation among siblings of children with cancer. Future work is warranted to identify the most beneficial types of support for siblings based on their age, developmental stage, and the cancer trajectory.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSiblingsAdaptation, PsychologicalChildHumansSocial Supportadaptationcancerchildhood cancerneoplasmsoncologypsychologicalpsycho-oncologyreview [scoping]siblingssocial adjustmentsocial support

Identifiers

PMID33851490
PMCPMC8363579
OpenAlexW3146276017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.