ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2021
A next generation sequencing-based analysis of a large cohort of ataxic patients refines the clinical spectrum associated with spinocerebellar ataxia 21.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dystonic Tremor as Main Clinical Manifestation of SCA21.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Clinical and Genetic Characterization of a Cohort of Brazilian Patients With Congenital Ataxia.Neurology. Genetics · 2024Article
- Myoclonus and Dystonia as Recurrent Presenting Features in Patients with the SCA21-AssociatedTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Tremor in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: A Scoping Review.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- BRAT1-related disorders: phenotypic spectrum and phenotype-genotype correlations from 97 patients.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- NGS in Hereditary Ataxia: When Rare Becomes Frequent.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeSpinocerebellar ataxia 21 (SCA21) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by TMEM240 gene mutations. To date, SCA21 has been reported only in a limited number of families worldwide. Here, we describe clinical and molecular findings in five additional SCA21 patients from four unrelated families, diagnosed through a multicentre next generation sequencing-based molecular screening project on a large cohort of patients with degenerative and congenital ataxias.
methodsA cohort of 393 patients with ataxia of unknown aetiology was selected. Following the identification of heterozygous pathogenic TMEM240 variants using a target resequencing panel, we carried out an in-depth phenotyping of the novel SCA21 patients.
resultsFive patients from four unrelated families, three of Italian and one of Libyan origin, were identified. These patients were carriers of previously reported TMEM240 mutations. Clinically, our SCA21 cohort includes both adult onset, slowly progressive cerebellar ataxias associated with cognitive impairment resembling cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome and early onset forms associated with cognitive delay, neuropsychiatric features, or evidence of hypomyelination on brain magnetic resonance imaging. None of our patients exhibited signs of extrapyramidal involvement. The so-called "recurrent" c.509C>T (p.Pro170Leu) mutation was detected in two of four families, corroborating its role as a hot spot.
conclusionsOur results confirm that SCA21 is present also in Italy, suggesting that it might not be as rare as previously thought. The phenotype of these novel SCA21 patients indicates that slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia, and cognitive and psychiatric symptoms are the most typical clinical features associated with mutations in the TMEM240 gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.