Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851369›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2021

One year of SARS-CoV-2 and lung ultrasound: what has been learned and future perspectives.

Andrea Boccatonda, Giulio Cocco, Eugenia Ianniello, Marco Montanari, Damiano D'Ardes, Claudio Borghi, Fabrizio Giostra, Roberto Copetti, Cosima Schiavone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Portal Vein Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Infectious Pneumonia and Lung Ultrasound: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. From the Triage to the Intermediate Area: A Simple and Fast Model for COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea BoccatondaDivision of Emergency Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. andrea.boccatonda@aosp.bo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-7790
Giulio CoccoInternal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, 'G. D'Annunzio' University, Chieti, Italy.
Eugenia IannielloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco MontanariEmergency Department, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Damiano D'ArdesInternal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, 'G. D'Annunzio' University, Chieti, Italy.
Claudio BorghiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Fabrizio GiostraDivision of Emergency Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto CopettiEmergency Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Latisana General Hospital, Latisana, Italy.
Cosima SchiavoneInternal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, 'G. D'Annunzio' University, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A first screening by ultrasound can be relevant to set a specific diagnostic and therapeutic route for a patient with a COVID-19 infection. The finding of bilateral B-lines and white lung areas with patchy peripheral distribution and sparing areas is the most suggestive ultrasound picture of COVID-19 pneumonia. Failure to detect bilateral interstitial syndrome (A pattern) on ultrasound excludes COVID-19 pneumonia with good diagnostic accuracy, but does not exclude current infection. The use of shared semiotic and reporting schemes allows the comparison and monitoring of the COVID-19 pulmonary involvement over time. This review aims to summarise the main data on pulmonary ultrasound and COVID-19 to provide accurate and relevant information for clinical practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansLungReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyCOVID-19ImagingLungSARS-CoV-2Ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID33851369
PMCPMC8043441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.