Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851266›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Real-world treatment results for ruptured blood-blister aneurysm of the internal carotid artery: analysis of a Japanese nationwide multicenter study.

Yusuke Egashira, Yukiko Enomoto, Noriyuki Nakayama, Miki Fujimura, Yuichiro Kikkawa, Masanori Aihara, Takatoshi Sorimachi, Takayuki Mizunari, Toru Iwama

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yusuke EgashiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan. egashi@gifu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-3531
Yukiko EnomotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
Noriyuki NakayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
Miki FujimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kohnan Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Yuichiro KikkawaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Masanori AiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Takatoshi SorimachiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takayuki MizunariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokuso Hospital, Inba, Chiba, Japan.
Toru IwamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruptured blood-blister aneurysm (BBA) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) remains a challenging lesion, even in the age of modern neurosurgery and endovascular treatment. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to investigate the real-world treatment choice and treatment results. We included 182 ruptured BBAs of the ICA treated at 51 neurosurgical centers in Japan between 2013 and 2017. The baseline patient characteristics, radiological features of the aneurysm, treatment modality, details of treatment, complications of treatment, and treatment results were retrospectively collected. The treatment strategy was divided into deconstructive and reconstructive procedures. Primary clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at final follow-up. Direct surgery was performed in 144 (79%) cases, and the remaining 38 (21%) cases received endovascular treatment. The majority of treatment selections were deconstructive and reconstructive procedures in the direct surgery group and endovascular treatment group, respectively. Overall, favorable clinical outcomes (mRS 0 to 2) were achieved in 66% of cases, and the mortality rate was 15% at the final follow-up (mean 23 months). There was no significant difference in clinical outcome between direct and endovascular treatment groups. Our large nationwide study compared the real-world treatment options for ruptured BBAs and their results. Our findings may offer beneficial information for treatment decision and for future studies investigating ruptured BBAs.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmCarotid Artery, InternalHumansJapanRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBlood-blister aneurysmInternal carotid arteryReconstruction methodsTrappingTreatment outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.