Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022
Comparison of stimulating dissector and intermittent stimulating probe for the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve in reoperative setting.
Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thyroid cartilage needle vs. endotracheal tube electrodes in EBSLN monitoring during thyroidectomy.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Recent Developments of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Thyroidectomy.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis is one of the most devastating complications after thyroidectomy. Thyroid reoperation is a great challenge for surgeons due to anatomical distortion and fibrosis and associated with a higher risk of RLN injury. In this study, we aimed to compare stimulating dissector (SD) with intermittent stimulating probe (ISP) in thyroid reoperations. This study is the first one which compares the impact of different nerve stimulating devices in thyroid reoperations.
methodsIncluded in this randomized prospective study were patients who had a bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy and would undergo a completion thyroidectomy due to a diagnosis of thyroid papillary cancer between January 2015 and January 2017. Patients were divided into two groups as SD group and ISP group. Age, sex, nerve amplitudes, latencies, the first identification time of RLN and complications were compared in both groups.
resultsA total of 32 patients, 16 in both groups, were included in the study. The demographics, nerve signal amplitudes and latencies were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). The mean RLN identification time in the SD group was 17.4 ± 4.3 min, which was significantly shorter than those in the ISP group (mean 21.3 ± 3.9) (p = 0.014).
conclusionThe first identification of RLN in the thyroid reoperations was faster with the use of SD than with the use of the ISP. Since the electromyographic amplitudes of RLN and vagus nerve with using SD were similar to the bipolar ISP, SD can be used safely for thyroid reoperations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.