Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851194›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021

The "drive to eat" hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants.

Jonathan C Wells, Peter S Davies, Mark Hopkins, John E Blundell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate are determinants of energy intake: implications for a theory of appetite control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan C WellsChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-8025
Peter S DaviesChild Health Research Centre, Centre for Children's Health Research, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia.
Mark HopkinsSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-0215
John E BlundellAppetite Control and Energy Balance Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds · GBChildren's Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity College London · GB

Funding

UK Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent work has challenged the long-held assumption that appetite functions to maintain stable body mass and fat mass (FM), suggesting instead that appetite matches food intake to energy expenditure and its correlate, fat-free mass (FFM). Whether this scenario applies to young infants, in chronic positive energy balance, remains unknown.

objectivesTo test associations of components of energy expenditure and body composition with milk intake (MI) and energy intake (EI) in 12-week infants, by reanalyzing published cross-sectional data.

methodsData were available for 48 infants. In addition to anthropometric measurements, we assessed MI and EI by test-weighing, sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) by indirect calorimetry, and FFM, FM, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water. Mean parental height was calculated as a marker of infant growth drive. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were applied.

resultsMI and EI correlated with FFM (r = 0.47 and 0.57, respectively; P < 0.01), but not FM (P > 0.6). MI and EI correlated with SMR (r = 0.42 and 0.53, respectively; P < 0.01) and TEE (r = 0.50 and 0.49, respectively; P < 0.01). SMR and TEE correlated with FFM (r = 0.41 and 0.42, respectively; P < 0.01), but not FM (P > 0.2). In a multiple regression analysis, MI was independently associated with TEE (partial r = 0.39) and FFM (partial r = 0.35). EI showed similar associations. Mean parental height was correlated with weight gain, MI, and EI.

conclusionsAs in adults, MI and EI in young infants were strongly associated with FFM and with total and sleeping components of energy expenditure, but not with fatness. The infant's growth drive contributed to these associations. This suggests that appetite is regulated by the rate of energy expenditure, the size of energy-using tissues, and tissue deposition rate, and that the high levels of body fat characteristic of infants may not constrain weight gain.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeMilkMilk, HumanAnimalsBody CompositionEnergy MetabolismFeeding BehaviorHumansInfantappetite controlenergy expenditureenergy intakefat-free massfat massinfant

Identifiers

PMID33851194
PMCPMC8326050
OpenAlexW3156484683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.