Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851065›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

An International Expert Survey on the Indications and Practice of Radical Thoracic Reirradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Robert Rulach, David Ball, Kevin L M Chua, Max Dahele, Dirk De Ruysscher, Kevin Franks, Daniel Gomez, Matthias Guckenberger, Gerard G Hanna, Alexander V Louie and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling Time-Dependent Recovery to Improve Esophagitis Prediction in Thoracic Reirradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A dedicated institutional clinical workflow and peer-review meeting for reirradiation.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Isotoxic stereotactic reirradiation for recurrent pelvic cancers.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-institutional virtual peer review for reirradiation: dedicated workflow and one-year results.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily accelerated hyperfractionated re-irradiation for thoracic malignancies.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Reirradiation: Evaluation of the occurrence and type in cancer treatment for lung - 2024.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Robert RulachInstitute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David BallSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kevin L M ChuaDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore.
Max DaheleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk De RuysscherDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School of Oncology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kevin FranksDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK.
Daniel GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gerard G HannaSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Alexander V LouieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada.
Drew MoghanakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta VA Health Care System, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
David A PalmaDivision of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, Canada.
Clive PeedellDepartment of Clinical Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Ahmed SalemDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation, Manchester, UK.
Shankar SivaSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Gregory M M VideticDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Anthony J ChalmersInstitute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Stephen HarrowInstitute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUCleveland Clinic · USEmory University · USJames Cook University Hospital · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGSt James's University Hospital · GBSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Zurich · CHWestern University · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThoracic reirradiation for non-small cell lung cancer with curative intent is potentially associated with severe toxicity. There are limited prospective data on the best method to deliver this treatment. We sought to develop expert consensus guidance on the safe practice of treating non-small cell lung cancer with radiation therapy in the setting of prior thoracic irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one thoracic radiation oncologists were invited to participate in an international Delphi consensus process. Guideline statements were developed and refined during 4 rounds on the definition of reirradiation, selection of appropriate patients, pretreatment assessments, planning of radiation therapy, and cumulative dose constraints. Consensus was achieved once ≥75% of respondents agreed with a statement. Statements that did not reach consensus in the initial survey rounds were revised based on respondents' comments and re-presented in subsequent rounds.

resultsFifteen radiation oncologists participated in the 4 surveys between September 2019 and March 2020. The first 3 rounds had a 100% response rate, and the final round was completed by 93% of participants. Thirty-three out of 77 statements across all rounds achieved consensus. Key recommendations are as follows: (1) appropriate patients should have a good performance status and can have locally relapsed disease or second primary cancers, and there are no absolute lung function values that preclude reirradiation; (2) a full diagnostic workup should be performed in patients with suspected local recurrence and; (3) any reirradiation should be delivered using optimal image guidance and highly conformal techniques. In addition, consensus cumulative dose for the organs at risk in the thorax are described.

conclusionsThese consensus statements provide practical guidance on appropriate patient selection for reirradiation, appropriate radiation therapy techniques, and cumulative dose constraints.

Identifiers

PMID33851065
PMCPMC8022147
OpenAlexW3125636706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.