Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851063›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Introducing Computed Tomography Simulation-Free and Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Monitored Palliative Radiation Therapy into Routine Care: Clinical Outcomes and Implementation Experience.

Thilo Schuler, Michael Back, George Hruby, Susan Carroll, Dasantha Jayamanne, Andrew Kneebone, Mark Stevens, Gillian Lamoury, Marita Morgia, Shelley Wong and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04658537 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Advanced Techniques for Single-fraction Palliative Radiotherapy Versus Standard Single Fraction Radiation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal North Shore HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsPalliative Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedArmsRadiation Therapy
NCT07117032 phase1recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective Pilot Clinical Trial of Simulation-Free Celiac Plexus Pain Ablation Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Cancer-Related Celiac Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled5ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Retroperitoneal Pain SyndromeArmsSimulation-free workflow, Celiac plexus SBRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptation of digital integration of PROMs and PREMs in oncology during implementation: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy - A state-of-the-art review.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thilo SchulerNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Michael BackNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
George HrubyNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Susan CarrollNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Dasantha JayamanneNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew KneeboneNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Mark StevensNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Gillian LamouryNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Marita MorgiaNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Shelley WongNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Kylie GrimbergNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Stephanie RoderickNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jeremy BoothNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Thomas EadeNorthern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Royal North Shore Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur purpose was to report outcomes of a novel palliative radiation therapy protocol that omits computed tomography simulation and prospectively collects electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving extracranial, nonstereotactic, linear accelerator-based palliative radiation therapy who met inclusion criteria (no mask-based immobilization and a diagnostic computed tomography within 4 weeks) were eligible. Global pain was scored with the 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Patients were coded as having osseous or soft tissue metastases and no/mild versus severe baseline pain (NPRS ≥ 5). Pain response at 4 weeks was measured according to the international consensus (no analgesia adjustment). Transition to ePRO questionnaires was completed in 3 phases. Initially, pain assessments were collected on paper for 11 months, then pilot ePROs for 1 month and then, after adjustments, revised ePROs from 1 year onwards. ePRO feasibility criteria were established with reference to the paper-based process and published evidence.

resultsBetween May 2018 and November 2019, 542 consecutive patients were screened, of whom 163 were eligible (30%), and 160 patients were successfully treated. The proportion of patients eligible for the study improved from approximately 20% to 50% by study end. Routine care pain monitoring via ePROs was feasible. One hundred twenty-seven patients had a baseline NPRS recording. Ninety-five patients had osseous (61% severe pain) and 32 had soft tissue (25% severe pain) metastases. Eighty-four patients (66%) were assessable for pain response at 4 weeks. In the 41 patients with severe osseous pain, overall and complete pain response was 78% and 22%, respectively.

conclusionsBy study completion, 50% of patients receiving palliative extracranial radiation therapy avoided simulation, streamlining the treatment process and maximizing patient convenience. Pain response for patients with severe pain from osseous lesions was equivalent to published evidence.

Identifiers

PMID33851063
PMCPMC8039552
OpenAlexW3107806780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.