Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33851006›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2021

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on LV function and central hemodynamics in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

Anna Lena Hohneck, Peter Fries, Jonas Stroeder, Günther Schneider, Stephan Henrik Schirmer, Jan-Christian Reil, Michael Böhm, Ulrich Laufs, Florian Custodis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Lena HohneckFirst Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter FriesClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Jonas StroederClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Günther SchneiderClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Stephan Henrik SchirmerSaarland University, Homburg/ Saar, Germany.
Jan-Christian ReilSecond Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Location Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Michael BöhmDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Ulrich LaufsClinic and Polyclinic for Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Florian CustodisDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Medical Center, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Saarland University · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinikum Saarbrücken · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed left ventricular (LV) function and central hemodynamic effects in patients with a heart rate (HR) at rest of ≥70 beats per minute (bpm) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) after long-term treatment with ivabradine compared to placebo by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS AND

resultsIn a randomized, double-blinded, prospective cross-over design, 23 patients (18 male, 5 female) were treated with ivabradine (7.5 mg bid) or placebo for 6 months. CMR imaging was performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months to determine LV functional parameters.Mean resting HR on treatment with ivabradine was 58 ± 8.2 bpm and 70.2 ± 8.3 bpm during placebo (p < 0.0001).There was no difference in systolic LV ejection fraction (ivabradine 57.4 ± 11.2% vs placebo 53.0 ± 10.9%, p = 0.18), indexed end-diastolic (EDVi) or end-systolic volumes (ESVi). Indexed stroke volume (SVi) (ml/m

conclusionLong-term reduction of HR with ivabradine in patients with CCS improved diastolic function and reduced mean aortic flow velocity.

Indexed as

ACS, acute coronary syndromeAD, aortic distensibilityArterial stiffnessbpm, beats per minuteCAD, coronary artery diseaseCCS, chronic coronary syndromecf, carotid-femoralChronic coronary syndromeCMR, cardiac magnetic resonanceCV, cardiovascularEDV, end-diastolicEF, ejection fractionESC, European Society of CardiologyESV, end-systolicFMD, flow mediated dilationHeart rate reductionHemodynamicsHFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fractionHFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fractionHR, heart rateHRR, heart rate reductionLV, left ventricularMRI, magnetic resonance imagingPER, peak ejection ratePET, peak ejection timePFR, peak filling ratePFT, peak filling timePWV, pulse wave velocityRHR, resting heart rateSV, stroke volumeVTC, volume-time curve

Identifiers

PMID33851006
PMCPMC8024658
OpenAlexW3138738313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.