Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850903›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Diagnostic value of linked color imaging based on endoscopy for gastric intestinal metaplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiaochuang Shu, Guozhi Wu, Yanjun Zhang, Yuping Wang, Ya Zheng, Qinghong Guo, Rui Ji, Yongning Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  4. Clinical usefulness of linked color imaging in identifyingWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Linked Color Imaging for Stomach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaochuang ShuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Guozhi WuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yanjun ZhangGeneral Internal Medicine Department of Donggang Branch, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuping WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Ya ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Qinghong GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Rui JiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yongning ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnostic value of linked color imaging based on endoscopy for gastric intestinal metaplasia has shown variable results. Therefore, this meta-analysis sought to systematically evaluate the value of linked color imaging (LCI) based on the blue laser endoscopy system for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM).

methodsLiterature searches were conducted of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to screen diagnostic tests of LCI. The random-effects model was adopted to calculate the diagnostic efficacy of LCI for GIM. Meta-DiSc 1.40 software was applied for the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios; symmetric receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves were drawn, and the areas under the SROC curves (AUCs) were computed. Quality of the included studies was chosen to assess using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

resultsSix original studies involving 700 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of LCI for diagnosing GIM were 0.87 (0.83-0.91), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 5.72 (3.63-8.99), and 0.17 (0.08-0.36), respectively. SROC curve analysis showed that the AUC value was 0.9283. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that LCI can be used for the accurate diagnosis of GIM. Considering weaknesses of available studies in terms of design, further studies with rigorous design are in need for further validating the findings of this meta-analysis.

Indexed as

diagnosisEndoscopygastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM)linked color imaging (LCI)meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID33850903
PMCPMC8039702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.