Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850866›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Analgesic efficacy of imrecoxib for postoperative pain following oral surgery: a prospective randomized, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Yu Jiang, Lili Qi, Jie Liu, Heming Wu, Yi Li, Linhu Zou, Zhiwei Guo, Jinqiang Wang, Huaiqi Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Imrecoxib: Advances in Pharmacology and Therapeutics.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu JiangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lili QiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jie LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Heming WuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi LiJiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, China.
Linhu ZouJiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, China.
Zhiwei GuoJiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, China.
Jinqiang WangJiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, China.
Huaiqi LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CNJiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImrecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase (COX-2) selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has been approved in China for more than 9 years. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of imrecoxib compared with celecoxib for patients with moderate or severe acute pain following oral surgery.

methodsPatients with moderate or severe pain within 6 hours following surgery were enrolled in this randomized, active-control trial. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either imrecoxib or celecoxib. Pain assessments on the visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, and pain relief were conducted at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours after the first dose. Adverse events were also recorded.

resultsEighty-seven patients were approached from November 2018 to August 2019. Of these, 60 were eligible for randomization. Ultimately, 56 patients (imrecoxib group, n=27; celecoxib group, n=29) were included in the analysis. The difference in total pain relief (TOTPAR) between the imrecoxib and celecoxib groups was 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.31-3.77], with the lower bound of the CI above the specified non-inferiority boundary. No perioperative complications were observed in the imrecoxib group during the 24-hour period after the first dose.

conclusionsImrecoxib could significantly relieve pain and has a non-inferior analgesic efficacy compared to celecoxib with good tolerance following oral surgery.

Indexed as

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)oral surgerypostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID33850866
PMCPMC8039693
OpenAlexW3136790310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.