ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Tracking-based deep learning method for temporomandibular joint segmentation.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Deep Learning Methods Differentiate Temporomandibular Joint Disorders From Healthy Joints? A 3D Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Study Based on CBCT Images.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Automatic segmentation and visualization of cortical and marrow bone in mandibular condyle on CBCT: a preliminary exploration of clinical application.Oral radiology · 2025Article
- Multi-class segmentation of temporomandibular joint using ensemble deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms Regarding Temporomandibular Joint Related Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Fully automated condyle segmentation using 3D convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe shape, size, and surface information relating to the glenoid fossae and condyles in temporomandibular joints (TMJ) are essential for diagnosing and treating. Patients with TMJ disease often have surface abrasion which may cause fuzzy edges in computed tomography (CT) imaging, especially for low-dose CT, making TMJ segmentation more difficult.
methodsIn this paper, an automatic segmentation algorithm based on deep learning and post-processing was introduced. First, U-Net was used to divide images into 3 categories: glenoid fossae, condyles, and background. For structural fractures in these divided images, the internal force constraint of a snake model was used to replenish the integrity of the fracture boundary in a post-processing operation, and the initial boundary of the snake was obtained based on the basis of the tracking concept. A total of 206 cases of low-dose CT were used to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, and such indicators as the Dice coefficient (DC) and mean surface distance (MSD) were used to evaluate the agreement between experimental results and the gold standard.
resultsThe proposed method is tested on a self-collected dataset. The results demonstrate that proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of DCs = 0.92±0.03 (condyles) and 0.90±0.04 (glenoid fossae), and MSDs =0.20±0.19 mm (condyles) and 0.19±0.08 mm (glenoid fossae).
conclusionsThis study is the first to focus on the simultaneous segmentation of TMJ glenoid fossae and condyles. The proposed U-Net + tracking-based algorithm showed a relatively high segmentation efficiency, enabling it to achieve sought-after segmentation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.