ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Clinical application and accuracy analysis of 3D printing guide plate based on polylactic acid in mandible reconstruction with fibula flap.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Redefining precision and efficiency in orthognathic surgery through virtual surgical planning and 3D printing: a narrative review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2023Review
- Article
- Virtual surgical planning/3D printing assisted fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap combined with anterolateral thigh flaps for extensive composite oromandibular defects reconstruction: a retrospective study of case series.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The Role of 3D Printing in Planning Complex Medical Procedures and Training of Medical Professionals-Cross-Sectional Multispecialty Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the special anatomy morphology and physiological function of the mandible, it has always become a challenge to accurately reconstruct the mandibular defect in maxillofacial surgery. Digital three dimensions (3D) printing surgical guide, as the effective method for individual and accurate surgery, is a hotspot of clinical research at present. In this study, 3D printing PLA surgical guide plate was applied to reconstruct the mandibular defect with fibula flap, its clinical effect and accuracy were evaluated, which aimed to improve the accurate reconstruction of mandibular defects.
methodsAfter sterilization, the dimension deformation of the PLA standard specimen were measured. Eighteen patients diagnose with mandibular tumor were collected as observation objects. Then partial mandible resection and simultaneous mandible reconstruction with fibula graft were implemented according to the computer-aided design plan. The clinical effects of 3D printing PLA guide plates application were evaluated by facial contours, occlusal stability and chewing function. Through registering the postoperative computed images reconstruction with preoperative designed shape, the reconstruction accuracy was evaluated by detecting the maximum difference including the distance between lateral convex point of the condyles, the distance between medial convex point of the condyles and the horizontal contained angle between long axis of the condyles.
resultsAfter high temperature steam sterilization, the curvature of the PLA specimen with 100% filling rate and 4.8 mm thickness were the smallest and their dimension deformation had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The minimally deformed 3D printing PLA guide plate were smoothly placed in the right place during the operation. After surgery, the face was symmetrical, the occlusal relationship was restored well and no deviation of the mandibular movement were found. The spiral computed tomography (SCT) scanning showed that the distance between lateral/medial convex points of the condyle and the horizontal contained angle were 128.34±8.68 mm, 88.69±6.75 mm and 145.87°±12.01°. Compared with preoperative design, the maximum deviation of the actual postoperative registration was 1.67±0.63, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
conclusionsThe application of 3D printing PLA guide plate in the segmental section and reconstruction of the mandible can effectively simplify the operation, and better reconstruct the continuity of the mandible. The surgical accuracy can fully meet clinical needs with relatively low prices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.