Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850817›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2021

An email-based survey of practice regarding hemodynamic monitoring and management in children with septic shock in China.

Ying Wang, Juan Qian, Suyun Qian, Chunfeng Liu, Yibing Chen, Guoping Lu, Yucai Zhang, Xiaoxu Ren, Infection Group of Sub-association of Pediatric Intensive Care Physicians

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ying WangPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Juan QianPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Suyun QianPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chunfeng LiuPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yibing ChenPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guoping LuPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yucai ZhangPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxu RenPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Infection Group of Sub-association of Pediatric Intensive Care Physicians
Shanghai Children's Medical Center · CNBeijing Children’s Hospital · CNCapital Institute of Pediatrics · CNChildren's Hospital of Fudan University · CNChina Medical University · CNShanghai Children's Hospital · CNZhengzhou Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding current hemodynamic monitoring (HM) practice patterns is essential to determine education and training strategies in China. The survey was to describe the practice of HM and management in children with septic shock in China.

methodsWe conducted an Email-based survey of members of sub-association of pediatric intensive care physicians. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions and gathered the following information: (I) general information on the hospitals, respective ICUs and participants, (II) the availability of technical equipment and parameters of HM and (III) management simulation of septic shock in three clinical case vignettes.

resultsSurveys were received from 68 institutions (87.2%) and 368 questionnaires (response-rate 45.1%) were included. Basic HM (93-100%) were reported as the most utilized parameters, followed by advanced HM which included central venous pressure (CVP) (56.0%), cardiac output (53.5%), and central venous oxygen saturation (36.7%), 61.1% (225/368) of respondents stated the utilization of non-invasive HM equipment. The factors such as ICU specialist training center (P=0.003) and more than 30 cases of septic shock per year (P=0.002) were related to the utilization of non-invasive monitoring equipment. In the simulated case vignette, 49.7% (183/368) of respondents reported performing fluid responsiveness and volume status (FR-VS) assessment. Despite differences in training centers (P=0.005) and educational backgrounds (P=0.030), FR-VS assessment was not related to the volume expansion decision.

conclusionsThere is a large variability in use advanced HM parameters, an increasing awareness and acceptance of non-invasive HM devices and a potential need for hemodynamic education and training in pediatric intensive care medicine in China.

Indexed as

childHemodynamic monitoring (HM)intensive carequestionnairesseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID33850817
PMCPMC8039781
OpenAlexW3136226568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.