ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2021
Analysis of Digestive Endoscopic Results During COVID-19.
Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Development and status quo of digestive endoscopy in China: An analysis based on the national census in 2013 and 2020.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on esophageal cancer resource allocation: a systematic review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Nomogram to predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: Clinical significance.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Effect of a disposable endoscope precleaning kit in the cleaning procedure of gastrointestinal endoscope: A multi-center observational study.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation ensures the quick removal of magnetic foreign bodies: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Nomogram to predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- Research progress of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Review
- Expression profiles of m6A RNA methylation regulators, PD-L1 and immune infiltrates in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Iron as the concert master in the pathogenic orchestra playing in sporadic Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Review
- The ultrasound use of simulators, current view, and perspectives: Requirements and technical aspects (WFUMB state of the art paper).Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Medical Facility in Japan.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore the necessity and safety of digestive endoscopy during the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019.
methodsA retrospective cohort study method was used to collect patients' data from the endoscopy center of the Civil Aviation General Hospital of China from February 1 to May 31, 2020, as the observation group. The patients' data of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment during the same period in 2019 were used as a control group, to compare the differences in the number of diagnosis and treatment and the detection rate of gastrointestinal diseases in the two groups. At the same time, patients and related staff were followed up for the situation of new infection.
resultsDuring the epidemic, our endoscopy center conducted a total of 1,808 cases of endoscopic operations and 5,903 cases in the control group. The amount of endoscopic work during the epidemic period was 30.63% in the same period last year. During the epidemic, 26 patients underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) treatment, 26 patients underwent ERCP, and 18 patients underwent gastrointestinal stent implantation. In the control group, 273 patients underwent EMR/ESD, 17 underwent ERCP, and 16 underwent gastrointestinal stenting. During COVID-19, compared with the same period last year, the detection rates of peptic ulcer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, and rectal cancer were significantly higher (
conclusionDuring COVID-19, the number of digestive endoscopic operations decreased significantly compared with the same period last year, but the detection rate of various diseases of the digestive tract increased significantly. On the basis of strict prevention and control, orderly recovery of endoscopic work is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.