ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021
Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy versus open surgery for non-tuberculous pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney: a single-center experience.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic vs. Open nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions: a meta-analysis emphasizing safety.BMC urology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with obstructive pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney (OPNK) often require simple nephrectomy for long-term severe clinical symptoms. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery for OPNK.
methodsThe study included clinical data of 69 patients with non-tuberculous OPNK from January 2015 to June 2019 in a single center. The patients were divided into laparoscopic group (LS, N=33) and open surgery group (OS, N=36). Those whose pathological findings were xanthogranulomatous inflammation or tuberculous granuloma were excluded. Statistical analysis compared the two groups in terms of basic demographic characteristics, preoperative laboratory examination results, and intraoperative and postoperative observation indicators.
resultsThe results showed that non-tuberculous OPNK were more common in women (female/male =4:1). Compared with the LS group, patients in the OS group had higher white blood cells (WBC; P=0.010) and neutrophils (P=0.005) counts before surgery. The main clinical symptoms were low back pain, pyuria, and fever; among them, low back pain combined with pyuria was in the majority. More intraoperative hypotension events were observed in the OS group (P=0.007). Notably, subgroup analysis showed larger stone size happened in the OS group (OR 3.538, 95% CI, 1.337, 9.208). No statistical difference was found in the duration of surgery between the two groups while the length of postoperative hospitalization and retroperitoneal drainage, and postoperative blood transfusion rate increased significantly in the OS group. Postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was more common in the LS group, while opioid analgesics were in the OS group (P=0.0006). There was no statistical difference in other complications.
conclusionsIn conclusion, considering the advantages of LS in terms of postoperative blood transfusion, surgical drainage and length of hospital stay, we recommend it for non-tubercular OPNK when the stone load of pyonephrosis side was less than 280 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.