Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850650›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Learning to perform role-filler binding with schematic knowledge.

Catherine Chen, Qihong Lu, Andre Beukers, Christopher Baldassano, Kenneth A Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Qihong LuDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0730-5240
Andre BeukersDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Christopher BaldassanoDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-5019
Kenneth A NormanDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-9682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through specific experiences, humans learn the relationships that underlie the structure of events in the world. Schema theory suggests that we organize this information in mental frameworks called "schemata," which represent our knowledge of the structure of the world. Generalizing knowledge of structural relationships to new situations requires role-filler binding, the ability to associate specific "fillers" with abstract "roles." For instance, when we hear the sentence

Indexed as

FillersFramesNeural networksRole-filler bindingRolesSchemaSchemata

Identifiers

PMID33850650
PMCPMC8019313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.